Rhys Reviews: Filmic Analysis

Welcome to my portfolio of film reviews and analytical discussion around cinema and television. Below are my pieces in order

  • Martin Scorsese Ranked

    Martin Scorsese is one of the most important filmmakers to come out of Hollywood, a pioneer who came out of the New Hollywood movement in the 1960s, releasing 26 different films which has ranged a career spanning between 1967 to the modern day. The director has also created various documentaries, and here we will be ranking his core 26 features, which are ranked as follows:

    26) Boxcar Bertha

    Barbara Hershey in Boxcar Bertha

    Scorsese’s second feature film, Boxcar Bertha feels like a proof of concept of the future of the director’s career in the crime genre. The film was offered to Scorsese after producer Roger Corman had seen his previous feature and requested him to make a sequel his exploitation feature, Bloody Mama. This would soon be reworked into an adaptation of Ben Lewis Reitman’s 1937 novel, Sister of the Road, which follows the titular character as she begins a career in bank and train robberies after becoming orphaned after the death of her father. A low budget feature, there feels like a lack of creative freedom from Scorsese, as the lower budget and the overwhelming sense of exploitation takes over an incredibly simple narrative. Corman was well-known for his cheap to make and produce low-budget features, commonly making the use of sex and violence as a pull for both filmgoers and VHS pullers. Scorsese would have more successful attempts at both the crime genre and the western genre, which knock this movie down his filmography

    25) Kundun

    Gyurme Tethong in Kundun

    The first of three religious features that will appear on this list, Kundun differs from the two other focus features because of its focus on a religious figure outside of Christianity. The film tells the life of the 14th Dalai Lama, Tenzin Gyatso, an exiled spiritual leader of Tibet, being based on the writings of the famous figure. The film was a massive political concern for distributor Disney, when being released, as the Chinese government threatened to block Disney from accessing the Chinese film market, leading to the distributor to limit the distribution of the film. The director would become banned from ever entering China, a ban which would eventually be lifted by 2015, when the director attended the premiere of his short film, The Audition, in Macau.

    Kundun is a grand feature for director Martin Scorsese, ambitious in its storytelling as a film epic, and though breathtaking in its visuals by cinematographer Roger Deakins, the film’s narrative core falls flat. There is very little attention to helping the audience become closer to the person at the heart of the narrative, walking out of the feature, an audience member will still know very little about how the Dalai Lama was as a person. A two hour plus film epic can only be held together if the central performances are strong, and the Chinese actors clearly struggle acting out of their native language, rendering a lot of the film tonally dull, with wooden performances hampering a technically superb feature

    24) Gangs of New York

    Daniel Dey Lewis and Leonardo DiCaprio in Gangs of New York

    One of Scorsese’s features that was in the pipeline the longest, the director originally becoming interested in directing the feature in his early career, before the release of either Mean Streets and Taxi Driver. The director would then acquire the screen rights to Herbert Asbury’s novel, The Gangs of New York: An Informal History of the Underworld, in 1979, but it would take twenty years for his film adaptation to finally come to life. Starring a broad ensemble cast which includes the likes of Leonardo DiCaprio, Daniel Day-Lewis, Cameron Diaz, Brendan Gleeson and Liam Neeson, the film follows the Catholic-Protestant feud between 1862 and 1863, just as an Irish immigrant group is protesting forced conscription during the Civil War. The film’s glaring problem comes from the lacking Irish accents from most of the cast, failing to feel authentic and true to the time when the film’s set dressing and script holds up such an authentic look at the period. Diaz sees herself being vastly miscast, with her storyline holding the film down from being at all possible to being one of Scorsese’s greatest films. The film tackles may variously themes and characters, but in such an ambitious way that leaves many of its feeling empty, with the film deciding to tackle everything to a minimal effect, compared to a minute amount to a wider effect. Daniel Day-Lewis holds the film together, holding as one of his strongest performances in a vast and creative career

    23) Who’s That Knocking at My Door

    Harvey Keitel and Zina Bethune in Who’s That Knocking At My Door

    A nominee at the 1967 Chicago Film Festival, Scorsese got his start as a director with the release of Who’s That Knocking at My Door. Starring Harvey Keitel, in one of his first collaborations with the director, the film follows the pull between sex and a free-spirited life and the connection to religion. This narrative comes forth from the character of JR, as he struggles to accept the fact that his romantic interest, played by Zina Bethune, has been raped. Based heavily in location on Scorsese and Keitel’s youth as Italian Americans, the film holds a level of authenticity to its locations, and its black-and-white photography gives it a very down-to-earth and documentary feel. The film roots a connection in Scorsese’s films through his exploration into religion, with the film capturing the void between the free-spirited life of sex and violence and how frowned upon that is in a world of faith and religion. Like Boxcar Bertha, a lot of the themes lack the punch that would come of Scorsese’s career, with a lot of the themes becoming even more prevalent in films like Mean Streets, which essentially acts as an improved version of this very film

    22) New York, New York

    Robert De Niro and Liza Minnelli in New York, New York

    In the DVD introduction to the film New York, New York, Martin Scorsese states that his intentions for the film were to make it into a homage to the musicals of Classic Hollywood that he grew up with, and to finally break away from the gritty realism that he was well known for. This break away from the norm has led to the film being mixed in reception, becoming a box office bomb when it was released against the competition of Rocky in 1977. It stands out as an outlier in Scorsese’s filmography, the artificial sets, bright colours and the music numbers stand out when compared to the realistic depictions of religious turmoil and the exploration into the mafia that the director is known for. However, that is where the film also fails at points, as Scorsese seems to still want both sides of the coin. Tonal incongruities exist across the film, as the film seems to almost spoof or critique the musical rather than pay homage to it. Every scene with powerful musical numbers is matched with a tonally different scene of tension-inducing fights between stars Robert De Niro and Liza Minnelli. It is a tonally confused film, which delivers on the promise of a Martin Scorsese musical, at least the film’s main single, titled the same as the movie, would become a worldwide hit

    21) Mean Streets

    Harvey Keitel and Robert De Niro in Mean Streets

    The first collaboration between Scorsese and Robert De Niro, who was introduced to the director through mutual friend Harvey Keitel, Mean Streets is the blueprint for the director’s most famous films to come, crime-mafia features. Being Scorsese’s first critical and commercial success, the film follows Keitel’s Charlie Cappa, who works as a gangster in Little Italy, Manhattan, as he attempts to keep the peace between his fellow gangsters and his psychotic childhood best friend, De Niro’s ‘Johnny Boy’ Civello. As a follow-up to Boxcar Bertha, the film sees Scorsese returning to his roots featuring characters and settings that he recognised from his childhood, making a movie personal to him rather than a movie designed by Roger Corman.

    Corman originally wanted involvement in the feature but only requested for the film to be a blaxploitation feature if he would back the film with funding, but the director would soon find other ways to fund the feature when being introduced to the road manager for The Band, Jonathan T. Taplin. As mentioned previously, the film almost acts as an improved version of Who’s That Knocking at My Door, as Charlie seeks to stay true to his religious beliefs as a low-level gangster, as he wishes to cause harm to no one, but also continues in his sexual relationship with Civello’s cousin, Teresa. It acts as a more developed version of the director’s first feature, with a more compelling side to it as a gangster feature, and shows the continued development of the director’s filmmaking skills

    20) The Age of Innocence

    Daniel Dey Lewis and Winona Ryder in The Age of Innocence

    Adapted twice already, as a silent film in 1924 and once again in 1934, Scorsese would direct his own film adaptation of Edith Wharton’s 1920 novel The Age of Innocence in 1993. Both film and novel follow the life of Newland Archer, played by Daniel Dey Lewis, who finds himself caught in a love triangle between two women, the conformist and safe May Welland, played by Winona Ryder, and the striking and unconventional Countess Ellen Olenska, played by Michelle Pfeiffer. Unlike New York, New York, which stands out from Scorsese’s filmography as a tonally confused collaboration between the Hollywood musical and Scorsese’s original drama features, The Age of Innocence acts as straight-up romantic-historical drama, with Scorsese allowing the narrative to form itself away from his sensibilities. The film stands apart because of its authenticity to the genre, which gave the film the Academy Award for Best Costume Design, as Dey Lewis gives an incredible performance among a talented cast, as the film delivers on the novel’s sad look at love, and the powerful nature of need and the romanticism of wanting more. The film’s exploration into class, and the forbidden nature of love in such a high society, marks a connection to Scorsese’s earliest works around sex and the society you are birthed in

    19) Cape Fear

    Robert De Niro and Nick Nolte in Cape Fear

    Cape Fear, a 1991 remake of the 1962 film of the same name, proved that Scorsese could make an easily accessible and commercial thriller, which combined his filmic characteristics with the crowd-pleasing fun you would expect from the genre. Originally conceived as a film through Amblin Entertainment, and to be directed by Steven Spielberg, Spielberg and Scorsese swapped projects once Scorsese realised, he had little drive to tell the story of what would become Schindler’s List. Starring Robert De Niro and Nick Nolte in the main roles, the film, which is also based on the 1957 novel, The Executioners by John D. MacDonald, follows a convicted rapist, played by De Niro, who seeks revenge on a former public defender who he blames for his imprisonment. Using his new knowledge of the legal system, De Niro’s Max Cady tracks down the man who caused his downfall, played by Nick Nolte, and attempts to terrorise the man and his family.

    Through this pursuit of the man’s family, the film draws upon the continued narrative thread of sexual development and sexual violence in a world with laws and rules, with Cady first being shown as an evil man when he rapes Nick Nolte’s Samuel Bowden’s flirtatious friend, who seems to be close to becoming an affair. Cady also impersonates Bowden’s daughter’s teacher and attempts to seduce her, going as far as to kiss her, marking a connection between violence and sex in the film, with various of the sexual acts in the film coming from the villain. Robert De Niro plays the character with so much charisma but also with clear venom, levelling up to a pure camp-filled performance in the closure, as the film goes for a clear Hollywood ending, unlike Scorsese’s usual efforts. A faithful remake of a Hollywood classic, which feels unlike Scorsese outside of his trademark topics thrown into the script, the film would go on to be marked as Scorsese’s first 100-million-dollar grosser at the box office, showcasing Scorsese’s talents for commercial hits.  

    18) The Aviator

    Leonardo DiCaprio in The Aviator

    A film project focusing on the life of Howard Hughes had been in the works across various Hollywood studios through the years before The Aviator’s release in 2004. Famous directors like Brian De Palma, William Friedkin, Christopher Nolan and Michael Mann were involved in film adaptations at various times, with stars like Johnny Depp, John Travolta and Nicholas Cage attached as well, but it was with Mann’s exit that Scorsese jumped onto the project. Based on the 1993 novel Howard Hughes: The Secret Life by Charles Higham, the film follows the life of aviation pioneer and director of the 1930’s war epic, Hell’s Angels, Howard Hughes. The film follows his life in the period between 1927 to 1947, during which the director had to juggle his aviation career, film career and his battle with obsessive-compulsive disorder. One of Scorsese’s most ambitious features, releasing with a 100-million-dollar budget, the film is highly entertaining, if not a little disjointed in the amount of content it needs to explore in Hughes’ life. It falls into the traps of many biopics, focusing on too much in such a large period, that at times elements feel very undercooked, but the film looks excellent. Cinematographer Robert Richardson breathes life into breathtaking flight sequences, as Leonardo DiCaprio gives a soul-crushing performance in various intimate moments, even if co-star Cate Blanchett clearly steals the show. Proved even more, by the fact, that she won the Oscar for Best Supporting Actress for the role

    17) Shutter Island

    Mark Ruffalo and Leonardo DiCaprio in Shutter Island

    Shutter Island is a simple story told in an engaging way with various stylistic quirks that make up for its narrative simplicity. It could easily be seen as another Cape Fear, Scorsese taking on a commercial thriller but involving enough of his own creative intent to make it something worth seeing. The film blends so many genres that matches the confusing nature of its narrative, making the use of unreliable narrators to it’s very best to make the movie incredibly rewatchable once you know the central twist. The film’s a neo-noir feature, with a detective narrative mixed in with supernatural and fantasy elements in the mystery, while the characters go through a psychological thriller, blending a film that both resembles the Cabinet of Dr. Caligari and Se7en.

    Based on the 2003 novel of the same name by Dennis Lehane, the film follows a Deputy Marshall, played by Leonardo DiCaprio, who comes to the titled Shutter Island to investigate a psychiatric facility after one of the patients goes missing. DiCaprio stars alongside other Hollywood giants like Mark Ruffalo, Ben Kingsley, Michelle Williams and Max Von Sydow, as they deliver thrilling performances that give the film its aura of mystery and horror, forever unknowing who to trust as the film thrusts you into DiCaprio’s character’s shoes.  Similar in a sense to Alfred Hitchcock films like Vertigo, it’s a mystery where the audience’s involvement in figuring out the mystery and feeling the mood of the location is the most important, and the film delivers exceptionally as so, and was successful enough commercially to become Scorsese’s second highest grossing film at the box office

    16) Hugo

    Chloe Grace Moretz and Asa Butterfield in Hugo

    1902’s A Trip to The Moon and 1904’s The Impossible Voyage may be two of the most important films ever made, films created by legendary French silent film director George Melies. Melies is an important director in his ground-breaking use of special effects in his fantasy and science-fiction features that would soon inspire the rest of the filmmaking world to follow, with the director pioneering the use of such important film techniques such as dissolves and time-lapse photography. Come 2011, Scorsese would release a rare film for the director, a feature aimed at the younger generation with connection to the filmmaking past, a film designed as a family picture. Though Hugo would disappoint at the box office, grossing only $185 million on an estimated $150 million dollar budget, it remains an interesting outlier in Scorsese’s filmography.

    Based on Brian Selznick’s 2007 book, The Invention of Hugo Cabret, the film tells the story of a boy who lives alone in a railway station in Paris, growing up in the 1930s. Soon, the boy becomes pulled into an adventure focused on his late father’s automaton and the filmmaker George Melies. This film is Scorsese’s film about the magic of cinema, in a similar way that The Fabelmans is for Spielberg, it’s a movie that connects itself to the passion Scorsese has for the medium and the medium’s history, and that passion shines through, Wonderful sets fill the screen, recreated in an attempt to be historically accurate to the director’s life, and the film is brimming with a sense of wonder and excitement that is needed for a family feature. Sacha Baron Cohen delivers a memorable comedic performance, and the 3D work gives the film a wonderful sense of child-like mystery

    15) The Color of Money

    Tom Cruise and Paul Newman in The Colour of Money

    Scorsese’s only sequel across his filmography, The Color of Money serves as a sequel to the beloved Hollywood classic, The Hustler, released in 1961. Both films are based on novels of the same name by writer Walter Tevis, with The Color of Money released as the author’s final novel, dying in 1984. Both film and novel follow the return of ‘Fast Eddie’ Felson, portrayed by Paul Newman, as he trains a protégé in Vincent Lauria, portrayed by Tom Cruise, as the two, and Lauria’s girlfriend, attempt to hustle various pool halls until they eventually make their way to a nine-ball tournament in Atlantic City. The film stands strong as proof of Scorsese’s brilliant ability to breathe life into what could be generic genre cinema, as he makes the sports-drama so entertaining and thrilling.

    It is hard to match up to the original feature that this film follows, with one of the major criticisms that this film faced in the press being that is not as good as The Hustler, but it can easily stand on its own. Newman delivers an engaging performance, that earned him the Oscar for Best Leading Actor at that years’ ceremony, and the actor bounces off Cruise well. The brewing respect and rivalry that builds between the two is delivered perfectly by both actors and through the undeniability powerful script by Richard Price, as the film hinges on this central dynamic. Scorsese manages to also breathe new life into pool on film that hadn’t been seen since the original film, with the dynamic camera work leaving the drama-based moments and the sports focused movies feeling as dramatic as one another

    14) Killers of the Flower Moon

    Robert De Niro and Leonardo DiCaprio in Killers of The Flower Moon

    The newest film released by the titanic director, Killers of the Flower Moon, was an Apple TV+ collaboration for the director, releasing both on the streamer and for a short while in cinemas. Based on the non-fiction novel of the same name, subtitled The Osage Murders and the Birth of the FBI, the film can be described as an anti-Western, or a revisionist Western. The typical Western believed in the traditional battle between good and evil, simplistically boiling down the cowboy into a traditional hero, and rooting itself in the American Dream. By 1968, once the Hays Code restrictions were relaxed, the genre became more open to less traditional depictions of the cowboy, subverting the romantic outlook of the West and the American Dream. Killers of the Flower Moon continues this look into the American West, following a series of murders of Osage Native members, after oil was discovered on their land.

    The 206-minute-long epic showcase the evil of the American hero, as they attempt to marry the Osage members for their wealth, led by Robert De Niro’s William King Hale. Unlike the novel, which displays a weighted series of events, focusing on both the Osage members and the FBI investigation, Scorsese’s film adaptation displays the troubles of the Osage members specifically, and the horrors that leads Leonardo DiCaprio and Robert De Niro deal on those members. The film is rooted in the corruption of greed, as Scorsese does for the Western which he had already done for the neo-noir, the musical and the thriller, depicting a typical genre through his own revisionist tendencies, a realistic outlook on Hollywood’s romanticised version of events. A powerful feature, the film was nominated for ten Academy Awards, but sadly did not receive any wins, though the Award season was marked by frequent wins for breakout star Lily Gladstone, who won the Golden Globe and Screen Actors Guild Award for Best Actress. The film showcased the ability for Scorsese to still be relevant in the modern day, crafting a superb feature which shone light on an important story

    13) The Wolf of Wall Street

    Leonardo DiCaprio in The Wolf of Wall Street

    Scorsese’s biggest commercial success, The Wolf of Wall Street drew in a $407 million dollar gross during its theatrical run. The film was based on Jordan Belfort’s 2007 memoir, as it recounts his career as a stockbroker and how his firm, Stratton Oakmont, engaged in fraud on Wall Street, eventually leading to his downfall. The film was met on release with both widespread successes critically and commercially, but a level of criticism that was never displayed at a Scorsese feature before. Its depiction of its lead character seems to display a level of moral ambiguity, being seen as almost glorifying these horrendous actions, and its depiction of graphic sexual content, extreme profanity, hard drug use and the use of animals in production, lead to various criticism.

    What seems to be lacking in initial professional criticism of the film is its satirical nature, DiCaprio’s Belfort seems cool and collected, the film depicting the fun and games that came with the job, but the film ends with him being caught and losing everything. His relationship with Margot Robbie’s Naomi seems to infantilize the character, as he is stripped of all identity at both his job and at home, as she takes everything and even takes control of the relationship sexually. Like films like American Psycho, the film builds to a reveal that its character is ridiculous and not meant to be pitied, the film just needs to get though the glorification of the character’s actions to get to the actual reveal. The Wolf of Wall Street is a brilliant depiction of greed and corruption, brought together by one of Leonardo DiCaprio’s strongest performances

    12) The King of Comedy

    Robert De Niro in The King of Comedy

    The King of Comedy continues to showcase Scorsese’s knack for crafting features around both unreliable narratives and morally confused individuals. One of Scorsese’s most uncomfortable films, and it is not even part of the horror genre, the film follows an aspiring stand-up comedian who is willing to do anything to make it big, as he becomes obsessed with a successful comedian who he met once by chance. Robert De Niro plays the central character, Rubert Pupkin, in one of his finest performances with Scorsese’ direction, portraying a character who is both sympathetic and terrifying at the same time. The film makes you feel uneasy with being the shoes of its lead, unwilling to trust his turn of events, as the film relies on its satirical black comedy tone to make its narrative both hilarious and harrowing all at once. It’s satirical depiction of celebrity culture and American media matches the tone perfectly, showcasing how far people can truly go when seeking fame and when following a celebrity that must not be treated as a martyr. The film was a flop at the box office, even if being released to strong critical reviews, grossing only $2.5 million dollars against a $19 million dollar budget. This marks the film truly as one of Scorsese’s lesser appreciated features

    11)The Last Temptation of Christ

    Willem Dafoe in The Last Temptation of Christ

    A film depiction of the life of Jesus Christ had been in the works through Scorsese for decades, from the production of Boxcar Bertha to The King of Comedy, only eventually receiving funding for the film from Universal Pictures after agreeing to make a commercial feature for them in the future, which would become Cape Fear. Scorsese received $7 million for a 58-day shoot. With a screenplay by Paul Schrader, the film was based on Nikos Kazantzakis’ controversial 1955 novel of the same name, which followed the life of Jesus Christ and the temptations that displayed themselves to him across his life, from fear, depression, lust and reluctance. The film was incredibly controversial, namely from various Christian groups who claimed the work was blasphemous for its depictions of Christ imagining himself engaging in sexual acts. The film was banned and censored in various countries, namely Greece, South Africa, Turkey, Mexico, Chile and Argentina, and remains banned to this day, in the Philippines and Singapore.

    Both novel and film depict Jesus Christ as a fully formed man, who must come to terms with the fact he will have to sacrifice himself, with Willem Dafoe delivering a moving performance as Christ. The film’s gravitas comes from its depiction of sexual need and lust in balance with the power of religion, a continued theme for Scorsese’s filmography, but made even more powerful when being depicted through Christ himself. Christ is besieged by promises of the Devil, as he balances his life with the need of his fate, as the film’s most powerful moment comes from Christ’s imaginations of the life he could have had if he did not die on the cross. Blasmephous to some, but it’s a moving portrayal of a figure you could never get outside of a Scorsese picture

    10) The Irishman

    Robert De Niro and Joe Pesci in The Irishman

    The Irishman is one of Scorsese’s most important works of the modern day, or even of his whole career, a film that feels like a send-off note to his time with the gangster feature. Based on the 2004 book I Heard You Paint Houses by Charles Brandt, the film follows Robert De Niro’s Frank Sheeran, a truck driver who soon becomes a hitman for mobster Russell Bufalino, played by Joe Pesci, who came out of retirement for the role. Later, he begins work for Teamster Jimmy Hoffa, played by Al Pacino, as the film chronicles his life from first hits to old age. Released with a limited theatrical run on 1st November 2019 and then followed by a streaming release on Netflix on 27th November of the same year, the streaming nature of the film allowed it to become the longest Scorsese feature yet, running for 209 minutes. The film seeks to squash the dream of the American gangster, telling its narrative from the perspective of the aging Sheeran, who begins the film recounting his story while in a nursing home.

    Marketed around its de-aging digital effects that made Pacino, De Niro and Pesci look younger based on the period, the film brings together gangster giants for a film that feels like a classic gangster narrative. Uniting three actors who have long been the faces of the genre, the film acts as almost an anti-gangster film, revealing the meaningless of the gangster’s actions, the years of work put into their personas and the secrets kept meaning nothing when they just age like the rest of us, and die all the same. The film can be easily seen a Scorsese coming to terms with his own age, exploring his most famous genre again but through the lens of a man who is aging and doesn’t know how much time he has left, seeking out what he hopes he will be remembered for. It only makes sense that the National Board of Review called The Irishman the Best Film of 2019

    9) Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore

    Ellen Burstyn in Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore

    Star Ellen Burstyn was offered another leading role by Warner Bros Pictures during the production of The Exorcist, and after a recommendation by Francis Ford Coppola and a screening of Mean Streets, Scorsese would be hired for his first major studio feature. Scorsese’s films have been heavily criticised for their lack of female representation, with outside of Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore and Boxcar Bertha there is very little leading roles for females in his features, mainly reserved for roles like daughter, mother and wife. Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore place the narrative completely around the female character, a woman’s film in genre, but with enough grit and realness that only Scorsese could bring to the feature. The film follows a widow who travels with her preteen son across the Southwestern United States in search for happiness and a better life, finding work in a local diner.

    The film is unlike any Scorsese feature, its sweet and warm, hopeful and pleasant, wrapped in a Scorsese bow with his signature level of darkness that balances out the pleasant nature of the feature. It avoids the tropes of the melodrama, with one of the goals of Burstyn and Scorsese being that it would not feel like a soap opera, those elements only come into play when needed, when Alice finally gets the life she wanted, after all the turmoil she must go through. The film would inspire a soap opera adaptation, just known as Alice, which ran on CBS between 1976 and 1985, and the film would garner Burstyn a well-deserved Oscar for Best Actress

    8) After Hours

    Griffin Dunne and Rosanna Arquette in After Hours

    Director Tim Burton originally had his eyes on directing After Hours, a at-the-time upcoming director who had just come off the release of his short film Vincent but pulled away from the project when Scorsese shown interest. After Hours currently stands as the director’s latest feature to not be an adaptation or a biopic. The neo-noir comedy follows Griffin Dunne’s Paul Hackett, a regular day office worker who becomes interested in a woman he meets one night and soon experiences a series of misadventures while attempting to make his way back home after initially going to meet her.

    The film can be summed as part of a growing subgenre of films at the time, known as the ‘yuppie nightmare cycle’, a genre which follows a young professional who is thrown under threat through events resembling both the film noir and a screwball comedy. The film containing itself to one night and one series of events gives it a serious sense of fast pacing and an energy that is unlike any other film from the director, its darkly comedic and in a way that Scorsese has never been able to pull off before. Themes focused on sex is still prevalent as always however, with Paul consistently emasculated by the various women that make their appearance known across the film, from Kiki with her sexual aggressiveness, Marcy’s neglect of his sexual want for her, Julie and Gail causing a mob to chase him, and then June trapping him in a phallic shaped plaster. The film seems to be about a search for masculinization, Paul going across the night attempting to both go home but also find himself as a man in a city full of women who are attempting to castrate him. The film portrays itself as a living nightmare, one that is both darkly humorous and narratively driven

    7) The Departed

    Jack Nicholson and Leonardo DiCaprio in The Departed

    An American remake of Andrew Lau and Alan Mak’s Hong Kong feature, Internal Affairs, had been bought by Warner Bros Pictures in 2003, with Brad Pitt among the proceedings to get the film made. Pitt would eventually walk away from the project, once Scorsese joined the project, and the central cast was formed as Leonardo DiCaprio, Matt Damon, who replaced Pitt when the actor left believing someone younger should be cast in the role, and Jack Nicholson. The remake, partially also based on the real-life Boston Winter Hill Gang, follows the Irish Mob Boss Frank Costello, played by Nicholson, who plants Colin Sullivan, played by Damon, as a spy within the local police force. At the same time, DiCaprio’s Billy Costigan is assigned to go undercover for the police in Costello’s mob. The film pits the two spies against each other as they both attempt to find the identity of the other.

    Scorsese wears his film influences on his sleeve in this crime feature, combining his inspiration from the original feature with films like 1932’s Scarface, 1931’s Little Caesar and 1949’s White Heat. Original film directors saw the film as a remake of all three Internal Affairs movies, with two sequels released in 2003, and the film is as ambitious as that sounds. It delivers an exceptionally crafted film focusing on identity, the sacrifices one must make to keep up appearances in society, and what people can do when pushed to conform to family and work’s expectations. The exploration into distrust could also be clearly read as reflecting the current state of the American population post-9/11, and the distrust that came after those events. The Departed held a true level of importance at the time of release, proving Scorsese’s increasing relevance in the 21st century

    6) Casino

    Robert De Niro in Casino

    Based on Nicholas Pileggi’s nonfiction book, Casino: Love and Honor in Las Vegas, Casino plays out as greatest hits of Scorsese’s mafia features and could even be called a follow-up in a sense to Goodfellas. Starring Robert De Niro, Sharon Stone and Joe Pesci, the film follows Sam ‘Ace’ Rothstein, a gambling expert who is asked to oversee the day-to-day casino and hotel operations at the Tangiers Casino in La Vegas. The film tracks his operations in the casino, the sudden appearance of the Mafia in the Casino business, and the breakdown of his relationships with wife Ginger McKenna and best friend Nicky Santoro. All primary characters are based on real people, with Sam being inspired by Frank Rosenthal, who ran four separate casinos in Las Vegas, while Nicky and Ginger are based on mob enforcer Anthony Spilotro and former dancer and socialite Geri McGee respectively.

    Released a mere five years after Goodfellas, the film almost seems inferior, but it is hard to match up to one of Scorsese’s very best, and Casino still stands strong alone by hitting the same beats incredibly well. It was called a safe narrative for Scorsese, off the back of such a thematically similar feature, but the longer runtime and the glossy direction in the Casino backdrop allows a more in-depth exploration into the setting and characters. What sets it apart is how much it strives to be like a film epic, it does not just rely on the characters and their dynamics, but the history and setting that the audience feels like they are peering on, collecting moments that feel like a well-developed and realised world

    5) Silence

    Liam Neeson in Silence

    The final piece of Scorsese’s central trilogy focused on spirituality, following The Passion of the Christ and Kundun, Silence went through almost two decades of production hell before finally being released in 2016. Based on Shusaku Endo’s novel of the same name, the film follows two 17th century Jesuit priests who travel from Portugal to Edo period Japan via Macau to locate their missing mentor and to spread Catholic Christianity. A cast led by the trio of Andrew Garfield, Adam Driver and Liam Neeson, this is one of Scorsese’s most thematically complex features, dealing with the comparisons between colonialism and the spreading of religion. The film introduces its ‘villains’, a group of disillusioned Japanese men and women who seek to force Garfield and Driver into joining them in their disillusionment, and the film then curves to reveal the balance between villain and hero here.

    The Japanese men and women see Garfield and Driver as a threat, Jesuit priests who are here to only cause them more pain in forcing them to believe in a God who they already believe has failed them, and they are pushing the same pain by torturing them into denouncing their God. It is a brutal, tragic and dark film, probably one of Scorsese’s most depressing and violent features, but its exploration into hope and compassion shines through thematically, feeling almost like a religious take on a future entry on this list, Bringing out the Dead. Silence comes in the acceptance that God is watching and helping even if he doesn’t make his presence known, that pain and suffering does not mean that God is not there, his Silence means just as much

    4) Taxi Driver

    Robert De Niro in Taxi Driver

    One of Scorsese’s most important features, Taxi Driver could be argued to be his most well-known feature along his long career. The first collaboration between Scorsese and writer Paul Schrader, the film follows Robert De Niro as Taxi Driver Travis Bickle, a mental unstable man who only gets worse when working nights across the city, as he becomes enrolled in a plot with a young prostitute. Considered now as one of the most important American features, the film released to various different controversies, namely the casting of twelve year old Jodie Foster as a child prostitute, the film inspiring John Hinckley Jr to attempt to assassinate US president Ronald Reagan and the threat of the film being given a X rating when initially released, moved down to a R once Scorsese desaturated the colours in a climatic battle with much bloodshed.

    The frightening thing about Taxi Driver, which many films inspired by the project, such as films like Joker, would forget about, is how straight De Niro plays Bickle. Bickle is the original Scorsese protagonist, the original character that would inspire, in parts, characters from films like The King of Comedy to The Wolf of Wall Street, a character who is intentionally a terrible person but is still the film’s protagonist. He is an outcast of society, but De Niro plays him as socially aware, socially conscious of how people are meant to act in society, but there are small subtleties about him that don’t work with societies’ norms.

    He takes a date to a porn film is one of the biggest giveaways, and Scorsese amounts him to a religious saint who is attempting to purge himself away from weakness, no matter if he goes to far in that quest. The direction is gritty and dark, with a view of New York that matches the grimy nature of its character, ending on an interesting note. After a bloody battle to save the life of Foster’s prostitute character, the film ends on a confusing note, as the social outcast becomes social hero, welcomed into society for his heroism, where if he was a moment earlier, it could have been seen as vigilante justice. The scene questions whether the scene is a dream, the dying thoughts of Bickle, or the cycle of delusion just repeating again, a compelling end to a compelling feature

    3) Raging Bull

    Robert De Niro in Raging Bull

    Raging Bull awarded Robert De Niro his second Oscar for Best Actor, an award perfectly deserved for the best performance in any Scorsese feature. The project was offered to Scorsese by De Niro, who had become enamoured by the story of Jake LaMotta while on the set of Francis Ford Coppola’s The Godfather Part II, but Scorsese turned it down for having a lack of familiarity or passion around a boxing feature. After nearly dying from a drug overdose, Scorsese took on the project to save his career, seeing a new passion in the battle in the ring. A battle in the ring could mean anything in Scorsese’s mind, a relatable battle to save his career, to become sober, or even to just get the movie made. The film, based on former middleweight boxing champion Jake LaMotta’s 1970 memoir Raging Bull: My Story, follows the career of the boxing champion, his rise and fall in the world of professional boxing and his personal life that was beguiled by his rage and jealousy. Shot in black and white, the film gives off the idea that it is a personal documentary about a man who is losing everything, giving the audience a fly on the wall-type perspective on the life of a man who lost everything because of his anger.

    That is the central narrative thrust of the movie, exploring the all-consuming nature of rage, outside and inside the boxing ring. De Niro plays LaMotta with such venom, making the boxing champion feel as sympathetic as he does look terrifying and scary, a boxing champion who is ready to burst into fists at any minute. The film’s balanced focus at both the boxing side of his life and his personal life allows the over-two hour film feel developed and deeply layered, with Joe Pesci, who works for Scorsese for the first time here, delivering a heartbreaking performance as a showcase of the horror that anger can cause, the destruction of their friendship is one of the many lynchpins of an amazing script by Paul Schrader and Mardik Martin

    2) Goodfellas

    Robert De Niro, Joe Pesci and Ray Liotta in Goodfellas

    Alongside Francis Ford Coppola’s The Godfather and The Godfather Part II, Goodfellas is the staple movie for the gangster genre, three films which essentially created the blueprint for a genre that is still kicking to this day. These films inspired television series such as The Sopranos, and it is clear to see why, many would argue that Goodfellas is Scorsese’s magnum opus. Based on the film’s screenwriter’s 1985 nonfiction novel Wiseguy, Nicholas Pileggi’s script follows the rise and fall of Mafia associate Henry Hill and his friends and family from the years of 1955 to 1980.

    The biggest takeaway from this film is the performances, with Robert De Niro, Joe Pesci and Ray Liotta walking away from the film with some of the most memorable performances of any film ever. The script would be composed of improvisation and ad-libbing that the stars would input into the project during rehearsals, which gives the dialogue a great feel of authenticity and naturality, Pesci specifically gets to showcase his darker side as one of the evilest characters in a Scorsese picture yet. The performance even awarded him with the Oscar for Best Supporting Actor.

    What separates the novel and the film away from regular mob-land films is its fly on the wall approach that would become synonymous with the director at this point in his career, both novel and film would tackle the day-to-day operations of the Mafia, foregoing any major Hollywood narrative in favour of a Mafia-at-home feature. The episodic nature of the script is given fresh life however with a Scorsese penned voice-over and a narrative that thrusts the audience between the present, past and future in various orders. Scorsese also layers the films with incredibly compelling directorial touches, making the use of freeze frames, fast cutting and various uses of the long tracking shot, giving the mob-home feature a incredible energy

    1) Bringing out The Dead

    Nicholas Cage in Bringing out The Dead

    Bringing out The Dead, one of Scorsese’s lesser appreciated features takes the top spot on this ranked list. Starring Nicholas Cage, the film follows a traumatic 48 hours in the life of a depressed and tired New York City paramedic. The film grossed only $16 million at the box office against a £32 million dollar budget, and when retrospectively talking about the project, Scorsese revealed the personal nature of the film.

    The film serves as a love letter to the brave men and women that work as paramedics and showcases the mental turmoil that they must suffer, showing Scorsese’s level of empathy for the people he saw working day and night during his youth. Paired with a wonderful script by screenwriter Paul Schrader, who had worked on the scripts for Scorsese classics like Taxi Driver and Raging Bull, the film plays out like a horror feature, or a neo-noir, with dark and grainy photography and editing which gives it this haunting feeling, recognising the audience with the horrors at display. Nicholas Cage leads a terrific cast who drop into the narrative at specific points to show the different perspectives of this night, and the different ways the workers will deal with this trauma. John Goodman, Ving Rhames, Patricia Arquette and Tom Sizemore are all incredible, but Cage easily takes the reins of the film.

    Haunted by the multiple people he could not save while on duty, and especially when he failed in resuscitating a homeless teen known as Rose, Cage plays the character with such subtle sadness. Cage has become well-known for his over-the-top performances, whether its in the critically panned The Wicker Man remake or his two Marvel outings as The Ghost Rider, but this character allows him to hone his sensibilities back. However, when he begins to boil over into his typical over-acting, it comes out as less humorous or impressive, and more on the sad side

  • Eddington Review

    Joaquin Phoenix and Pedro Pascal in Eddington

    The effects of COVID-19 on the film industry are still being felt to this day, a virus which shut down the entire world for an entire year and pushed back every studio’s film schedules for the year. Based on the box office of the decade, regular film-going numbers have increasingly gone down, with the once guaranteed success of films like superhero movies and animated movies being long-gone. Streaming services became the new hot commodity in Hollywood, and it will be a long time until the cinema rises back to its 2010s era of popularity, where 1 billion dollar grossing feature films were so common. Films about the period of COVID-19 lockdown has become an interesting film trend in response to the real-world events, with the release of films like Host, a horror film which captured the isolation felt during the time when the world revolved around Zoom videochats. The James McAvoy-starring film, Together, captured the breakdown of a marriage during the lockdown, as the lockdown brings apart a loving relationship rather than holding them close together. The newest film to capture his specific topic comes as the film, Eddington, from director Ari Aster. The director got his start in the horror genre, releasing Hereditary and Midsommar through the production company A24, with the former being A24’s highest grossing film at time of release. The director moved away from the genre that made him famous with the release of Beau is Afraid in 2023, a surrealist comedy epic that was a box office bomb but featured the first collaboration between the director and future Eddington star Joaquin Phoenix.

    The director has reported that he had a pitch for a contemporary Western film but pushed the project back to work on his horror features, and now he has circled back to it. Joined by Joaquin Phoenix as star, Eddington tackles more than just the COVID-19 pandemic, as it acts as a grab bag of many societal issues that happened during 2020, with the film acting as black comedy take on every side of the political spectrum. The film’s plot focuses around the political and social turmoil that happens in Eddington, New Mexico, as Sherrif Joe Cross and Mayor Ted Garcia come to blows during the years’ mayoral election.

    Joaquin Phoenix in Eddington

    Capturing such an impactful year as 2020 is going to be hard for any filmmaker, but Ari Aster seems the closest at being able to pull it off. What begins as a story about the divide between a town amongst the COVID-19 mask protocols, with a clear divide between the republican and democratic responses to life wearing masks and protected from the virus, becomes a narrative that reinvents itself frequently. This is certainly not going to be a film for everyone, it changes tones and its narrative throughline constantly, acting as a checklist of topics to cover from the 2020 period, but it manages to pull this off perfectly. It evolves into a narrative that is perfect for one focused around a police department in a year which brought the morality of the American police department into question. George Perry Floyd Jr, an innocent African American man, was murdered on 25th May 2020, after a white police officer, known as Derek Chauvin, knelt on Floyd’s back and neck for over nine minutes. Floyd’s final words ‘I can’t breathe’ would become a rallying slogan during the Black Lives Matter protest across the year of his death, a year which marked a remembrance of the various past cases of police brutality, especially towards black people, and called for a systematic revaluation of the police force and the people employed to protect the peace. Eddington seeks to spoof the police officers that caused the systematic violence during the period, the governmental bodies that attempted to make profit at the time, and the bad faith actors that turned a peaceful protest into a period of looting and rioting.

    Aster does not pull his punches in the film, and does not play sides, in a way that may offend some audiences but plays true to the dark comedy genre. Both sides of the political angle are criticised heavily, with the film continuing Aster’s motifs focusing on the loss of individual identity in the face of communal or inherited forces, and cult-like behaviour. Hereditary and Midsommar feature actual cults, as the characters lose themselves to firstly possession, and then, in Midsommar’s case, the pull to a better life in the cult. Beau is Afraid explores the loss of identity through childhood trauma, as a child becomes one with the cult-like impression of its mother and family. In comparison, Eddington explores the cult-like nature of joining a noble cause for selfish reasons, as one loses their identity to a cause they do not believe in and betrays their own morals. This is also shown through the police department, with the one major African American character, played by Michael Ward, being a cop. He is judged for being a member of the police department during this time, and the film truly questions is it morally safe and morally sound to be a part of the department as an African American.

    Emma Stone in Eddington

    What keeps the film afloat in its social commentary is that its central character, played by Joaquin Phoenix, is centralised as the most despicable character in the film. No matter what jabs the film pulls at either political side, or contemporary moment during the 2020 season, it is still all morally above water by comparing it to the struggle of Phoenix’s protagonist. Phoenix’s character will be contentious but is brought to life by a very controlled performance from the star, who keeps the character from feeling too silly, but also keeps just likeable and despicable enough at the same time. He serves to bridge the film into its final section, where it essentially becomes an adaptation of Cormac McCarthy’s Blood Meridan, or Ethan and Joel Coen’s adaptation of McCarthy’s other text, No Country For Old Men. The film captures the fear of being hunted perfectly, capturing a sense of paranoia and terror that hasn’t been seen in the director’s work since his departure from the horror genre. Composers Bobby Krlic, who previously worked with Aster on Beau is Afraid, and Daniel Pemberton, known for the scores for films like Spider-Man: Into The Spider Verse, work wonders to deliver a score that feels at home in a horror film rather than this social drama, delivering a sense of unease that muddles the tone on purpose.

    Aster never forgets to also focus heavily on the family drama aspect of his narratives, family trauma is always at heart of his narratives, whether its Toni Colette’s grief over her daughter’s death in Hereditary, Beau’s trauma around his childhood with his mother, or the suicide of Florence Pugh’s sister that forms the narrative of Midsommar, its always present. Here, Phoenix’s Joe Cross, must deal with the disfunction at home with his wife, played by Emma Stone. Stone’s role is minimal but crucial and easily could be analysed as Aster taking a shot at cancel culture and the commercialisation of the Me-Too movement in the modern day, and potentially how it has been angled away from true cases. Austin Butler portrays essentially a cult leader, an internet personality that takes advantage of the dissolution between husband and wife, and he delivers his performance exceptionally. He seems a mix between Andrew Tate and former actor Russel Brand, an internet personality that has become increasingly more famous because of everyone’s affinity for their phones in a time when they are locked at home. The rest of the cast serve their roles well enough, with Pedro Pascal playing a charming but multi-layered mayor who seems to have sold his soul to mega corporations, and Luke Grimes delivering an evil but humorous police officer character.

    Austin Butler and Joaquin Phoenix in Eddington

    Aster has proven himself an actor who has a firm eye for contemporary commentary, whether it was around toxic relationships in Midsommar, or sexually focused family abuse in his initial short film debut, The Strange Thing About the Johnsons in 2011. He has only continued to impress with Eddington, a film that is not going to be for everyone. Its dark comedy is hard hitting while also being hilarious and does not choose sides, it is bound to offend some, but it works more as a commentary than it does not. The performances are strong and entertaining, Joaquin Phoenix leads an ensemble cast as such a despicable character, and his character matches the changing tones and genres that the film tackles across its runtime, turning from a socially conscious drama to an intense action film. The film seems to have one goal, to be a film which combines essentially ever major 2020 conspiracy theory into one exceptional film, and it works incredibly well.

    Joaquin Phoenix, Luke Grimes and Michael Ward in Eddington
  • Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me Review

    Kyle MacLachlan and Sheryl Lee in Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me

    Famous director David Lynch died this year, on the 15th January 2025 at the age of 78. He was well-known for his avant-garde filmmaking, which focused on surrealist and experimental features, becoming one of the most famous and well-respected directors of the modern day. Releasing 10 films across this career, his most iconic features would include his directorial debut Eraserhead, the drama adaptation The Elephant Man, the neo-noir mysteries Blue Velvet and Mulholland Drive, and the space opera adaptation Dune. However, what could be argued as his most well-known and well-regarded project would be the ABC series, Twin Peaks. Premiering on April 8th, 1990, and running for two initial seasons until 1991, the series followed the residents of the town Twin Peaks, as the town’s golden daughter, Laura Palmer, mysteriously dies. FBI special agent Dale Cooper arrives to the town to help the investigation but is soon drawn into a darker story which mixes the melodrama of a soap opera, eccentric comedy that was common to Lynch’s work and horror and surrealist elements. Created with co-showrunner Mark Frost, the show was pitched to the network around the mystery of Laura Palmer’s death, but Lynch and Frost made the promise that the mystery would eventually become a background element of the show as the audience becomes more comfortable with the residents of Twin Peaks.

    Opening title sequence of ‘Twin Peaks’

    After an incredibly successful first season, which Lynch directed multiple episodes across the 8 initial episodes while multitasking with his feature film Wild at Heart, ABC demanded season 2 to put an answer to the question of who killed Laura Palmer. Being forced to reveal such a crucial plot reveal prematurely led to a lot of knock-on effects for the famous show, namely Lynch and Frost both stepping back from the show until returning for the finale, and a ratings decline. Once being one of the most watched shows in 1990, the 15th episode of the show’s second season would be placed 85th out of 89 for ABC’s ratings numbers. The return of Frost and Lynch to the writer’s room could not save the show, and after multiple timeslot changes that only hindered the show more, the show would be placed on indefinite hiatus and eventually cancelled on a cliffhanger. Though the show would eventually return for a third season in 2017, that would finally address the long-simmering cliffhanger, fans’ original hope for answers would come in Lynch’s feature film follow-up, Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me.

    Released in 1992, the film serves as a prequel, a fact that turned off many viewers who were hoping to finally receive the answers to Twin Peaks’ cliffhanger ending, where series protagonist, Dale Cooper, was replaced with an evil doppelganger. The film was booed during its screening at the Cannes Film Festival, and was panned by the American press, eventually ending up as a box office bomb. Foregoing the show’s large cast of eccentric characters and its upbeat and humorous tone, the film goes for a darker tone and a surrealist directorial style that was more in line with Lynch’s work. A set of deleted scenes would be recut into a separate film, Twin Peaks: The Missing Pieces in 2014, which featured the various characters from the show that were cut from the film for time. Instead of the larger cast, the film focuses on the murder of Laura Palmer, stepping the audience into the toes of the character that was only known to her audience because of her death. She is plagued by the malevolent spirit known as Bob, as the film tracks her final seven days, where she soon finds out that her own father is Bob.

    The move between television and film comes with the movie literally beginning with the smashing of a television by a man as he murders Teresa Banks, the original victim of Bob. This opening marks the idea that Lynch seems to be putting across the film, that nostalgia and fan service is not what the film exists for, it is pulling its audience into unfamiliar settings and setting itself apart. This would be a decision that would be followed in the show’s third season, known as The Return. This can be seen even more by the film’s opening act, where FBI agents Chester Desmond and Sam Stanley are assigned to investigate the death of Teresa Banks in Deer Meadow, Washington. With the appearance of Gordon Cole, a character played by Lynch himself in the series, and the appearance of a death girl for the FBI, the film begins with a false sense of security. The plot sounds eerily familiar to Twin Peaks’ original storyline, with the opening act even initially planned to feature Cooper instead of Chester Desmond, but actor Kyle MacLachlan requested for his role to be lessened compared to the series.

    David Lynch, Chris Isaak Kiefer Sutherland in Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me

    The plot may seem familiar, but the setting of Deer Meadow welcomes the film to breaking that familiarity, as the settings that would be central to comedy for the series would instead be conveyed as combative and tension-building. The residents of Deer Meadow do not welcome the FBI with open arms, shown through the diner sequence, a place that was routed into the television series as a place of comfort and joy. The police department welcome Cooper into Twin Peaks with open arms, as Sherrif Truman essentially becomes Cooper’s best friend straight away, but the police department of Deer Meadows are violent towards Desmond and Stanley. These differences open the film for an audience familiar with the brand that things are not going to be the same here, you cannot go home, and everything will feel the same.

    This difference in tone translates over when the film transitions over to the familiar town of Twin Peaks. The series’ iconic theme, composed by Angelo Badalamenti, pulls the viewer into feeling comfortable, but rather than pulling into one of the various characters that make up the show, the first character we see is Laura Palmer. Actress Sheryl Lee finally gets to play Laura Palmer in all her various shades of grey, a fully realised character that only existed as a dead body and a ghost that haunted the Black Lodge in the series. The feeling of unfamiliarity is mirrored by the appearance of Donna Hayward, Laura’s best friend, who is recast and played by actress Moira Kelly here. Donna may be Laura’s best friend, but Laura refuses to allow Donna to become like her, to follow her into her sexual liberation or her sexually driven sadness, and the recasting almost adds a sense of isolation to the proceedings.

    The pieces fall into place across the film, as the film retraces the steps of the investigation into her death from the film, as Laura places those clues down that Cooper, Truman and the rest of the cast would soon discover. The investigation in the series brought unexpected reveals to Laura’s character, the golden girl who brought food to the less fortunate and helped with English lessons, was revealed to be moonlighting as a prostitute, and cheating on her drug dealing boyfriend. Laura Palmer haunts the narrative of Twin Peaks, and it is until the reveal that her own father was sexually assaulting her that you get a full understanding of Laura. The events surrounding Laura’s death are choreographed to feel true and real, the comedic overtones of the show are replaced by scenes that are shocking and disturbing, from the explicit rape of Laura, to seeing her death played out through her own point of view.

    Ray Wise, Grace Zabriskie and Sheryl Lee in Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me

    Ray Wise plays Laura’s father, Leland, and he is easily one of the most complex performances and characters across the film. Leland’s reveal as Bob came as the final straw in Lynch and Frost’s relationship with the studio, a reveal that would have been saved for many seasons in the future. The reveal and execution of that storyline however is incredibly powerful, as Ray Wise gives a fantastic performance with his last scene, crying in his final moments as he realises what he has done to Laura throughout the years. There’s a clear intention to blur the lines of what really Leland is, and how much control does Leland have in his own body when Bob is in the mix. Fire Walk With Me continues this distinction, Wise plays the character as both terrifying and sympathetic, he is ruthless, demanding his daughter to clean her hands before dinner or verbally assaulting her once he catches wind of her relationship with James Hurley. However, he also has scenes of genuine kindness and remorse, as he apologises for his dinnertime outburst and hugs Laura. It is clear from the series that Leland was sexually abused in his youth as well, potentially by Bob, and he is just passing that trauma down to his own daughter.

    The home is portrayed as something frightening for Laura, as the fan spins above, and her own mother seems to be ignoring the sexual abuse her daughter is facing. Grace Zabriskie’s Sarah Palmer smokes and cries at what is happening to her daughter, and screams for Leland to stop his verbal attack, but never protects her daughter, she knows what is going on but is powerless to do anything about it. The entire proceedings are just played incredibly straight and sad, there is so little comedy after the opening act, and it just hits home harder how real this movie feels. Stripping out all the supernatural aspects, the film is boiled down to a domestic drama about the sexual abuse faced by a young daughter, a father who is inflicting that sexual abuse while questioning why he is doing so, and a mother who just wants to look the other way.

    David Bowie in Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me

    Mark Frost declined to be involved in this film, as Lynch and Frost were mixed on what to write the story around; Lynch wanting a prequel, and Frost wanting a continuation of the events of the series. Frost would continue to be involved in the franchise for years after, penning various supplemental material, such as The Secret History of Twin Peaks in 2016 and Twin Peaks: The Final Dossier in 2017, before having an equal role in the show’s revival. However, Lynch’s signature surrealist nature comes about across the runtime of Fire Walk With Me, leaving the show as much as a prequel as it is a sequel. Various characters make their appearance known across the runtime, and some creative visuals open the door for their return in the show’s third season, name in point being the namedrop of Judy, and the appearance of David Bowie’s Phillip Jeffries. There is even a brief appearance of a character from the future, as Annie Blackburn appears from the Black Lodge, a character who was added to the original in the tail end of the second season as an attempt to raise ratings by giving Cooper a love interest. She appears in an unsettling sequence, where the bloodied body of Annie appears after being trapped in the Black Lodge at the end of the series, and warns Laura that the good Cooper is trapped in the Black Lodge. This would be written in Laura’s diary and become one of the most important plot points moving forward.

    These sequel moments highlight the dream-like nature that would soon come in Twin Peaks: The Return, as the film bridges the gap between soap opera-drama and Lynch’s signature filmic tendencies. The signature red drapes, eerie editing with quick cuts and over-lit blinding horror scares, a strong control over sound and the use of silence and blaring music, are all signatures to how Lynch creates that dream-like reality for his films, and it is incredibly present here. But, at heart, the movie is the story of Laura Palmer, a character who the audience never actually meets. This film allows that audience to become familiar with the character, and her struggles, and when they will return to the show’s pilot episode again, and Andy and Truman find her body, the audience will grieve alongside them.

    Sheryl Lee in Twin Peaks: Fire Walk With Me
  • The Legacy of The Exorcist

    Linda Blair in The Exorcist

    On release in 1973, audiences waited out in long lines for Warner Bros biggest film since The Godfather, a film which was reported to have some of the strongest audience reactions to this date. Various viewers reportedly fainted during sequences, a New York citizen was reported to have miscarried, and one man was carried out in a stretcher after only 20 minutes. Nausea was frequent, and Catholic viewers, including both people who had lapsed in their faith and current faith practisers, stated that they experienced spiritual crises before and after watching the film. In the UK, the film drew protests from the Nationwide Festival of Light, a Christian public action group, and once released on home video, the film was withdrawn from being available after the passing of the Video Recordings Act in 1984, which sought to ban so called ‘video nasties’. This film, which gained so much outrage and paranoia, is The Exorcist, director William Friedkin’s supernatural-drama based on screenwriter William Peter Blatty’s 1971 novel of the same name. The Exorcist has become an iconic horror feature in the time since, spawning a franchise and influencing the future of the horror genre in subsequent years, after grossing $193 million worldwide, and a lifetime gross of $441 million after re-releases. The film spent decades as the highest grossing R-rated film (adjusted for inflation), until being de-throned by Stephen King adaptation IT in 2017, and became the first horror film to be nominated for the Academy Award for Best Picture, with Blatty winning the Academy Award for Best Adapted Screenplay and the production crew taking home the Academy Award for Best Sound.

    William Peter Blatty’s original novel was inspired by the one of the very first cases of demonic possession known to the public, a phenomenon that would being more widespread in the years after the release of the Exorcist. Exorcisms, performed by the Catholic Church, were a low commodity in the years before Friedkin’s film, but cases reported to the Church became more frequent after the film’s release. It would even get to the point that demonic possession would come to the courts in 1981, with the trial of Arne Cheyenne Johnson, who claimed that he was possessed by the devil when committing murders. The trial would go on to be the basis of the third Conjuring film, The Conjuring: The Devil Made Me Do It in 2021.

    Behind the scenes of the Head Twist sequence in The Exorcist

    Blatty’s basis would be a lot less mainstream than Johnson’s case, with the novel being based on a series of exorcisms performed on an anonymous boy by the attending priest, Raymond J. Bishop, and under the pseudonym ‘Roland Doe’ or ‘Robbie Mannheim’. It was claimed that the boy became possessed after coming into possession of a Ouija Board, which would become a small plot point in Blatty’s screenplay. So little was known about the case during Blatty’s discovery of the events, that it took until December 2021 for the American magazine, The Sceptical Inquirer, to report the purported identity of the boy as Ronald Edwin Hunkeler. Blatty’s signature drive to craft the novel came from seeing Roman Polanski’s adaptation of Rosemary’s Baby in 1968, being drawn to the film’s ability to keep the audience unsure whether Rosemary’s concerns for the supernatural nature of her baby were genuine or unfounded. He was, however, unhappy in the ending, believing the reveals to be shlocky in nature, and was determined to craft a novel that bridged the world between realism and the supernatural convincingly.

    The appearance of Pazuzu in The Exorcist

    This becomes the route of the narrative thrust of both the novel and the film adaptation. The Exorcist follows the mysterious demonic possession of eleven-year-old Regan MacNeill, the daughter of a famous Hollywood actress. Her mother, Chris, pursues every angle to try and explain what is wrong with her daughter, and after scientific means fail her daughter, she recruits two priests to try and exorcise the demon. Those priests come in the form of Father Damian Karras, a priest who has lost his way after the death of his mother, and Father Lankester Merrin, who has done battle with the demon before. The novel and film retain the same basic plot developments, but Blatty’s screenplay narrows the focus down to the key plot points and characters that make up the narrative crux. The time frame of the events is shortened, and characters like Chris’ staff, Dennings and Regan’s father are removed entirely. A lot of the most horrifying content of the novel was also toned down in scripting, mainly the sexual aspects, once it was clear an age-accurate actress would play the eleven-year-old character. Blatty’s screenplay also foregoes the ambiguous nature of the novel’s perception of the supernatural events, with each occurrence of Regan’s supernatural abilities being paired with a reference to a real-world case where the root of the problem was revealed to be scientific in nature. Outside of Karras’ initial concerns over the validity of the claims, the film version removes the sceptical perspective entirely.

    This lack of scepticism leads the emotional throughline of the film’s narrative, a mother’s pursuit to do anything possible to save her daughter. Chris is a famous actress and moves herself and her daughter to a new home for an upcoming role, and this movement leads to an isolation for her character instantly, and Blatty’s screenplay pairs the small-town drama aspect with horror perfectly. The film never gives the viewer a perfect answer for how Regan becomes possessed, it could be the Ouija board, but its never told for sure, and this mystery thrusts Chris into action. She takes Regan to every scientific expert she could think of, with the film displaying these scientific machines as cold and terrifying, with many audience members finding the angiography sequence to be the film’s most unsettling moment. When all the natural means fail her, the film crosses over into the supernatural with her, placing her complete faith in the unknown and to the two priests that could save her daughter. Ellen Burstyn delivers a moving performance across the film, capturing a vulnerability and an openness to a mother who will do anything for her daughter, and the slow-moving nature of the opening allows the audience to gain a connection to the bond between Chris and Regan, and even more so Burstyn and Linda Blair.

    Jason Miller in The Exorcist

    The balance between realism and faith also comes in the character of Karras, played by Jason Miller. Karras is a complex character, he is railroaded by his grief, losing faith in God after he seen his mother go through so much pain before death. It’s this pursuit of meaning to regain his faith which holds together his arc. He falls under the pull of his grief when Regan’s possessed self makes fun of his mother, but he ends the film allowing good to prevail. His fall from the window allows him to remove the demon from the mortal plane, and he knows that in his death, God will accept him once again. Miller’s performance matches Burstyn’s, he is calm and collected, the pain coming from his eyes and his facial expressions, but he conveys a sense of warmth and kindness. These two central performances convey why The Exorcist is such a compelling film, it bridges the world between horror and drama so perfectly, it’s a movie about a woman trying to save her child and a man trying to regain his faith, with supernatural undertones to compliment those narrative elements.

    That is not to say, however, that The Exorcist is without its frightening scares. What once was known as ‘one of the scariest films ever made’, may feel less frightening to a modern audience who are used to supernatural clowns and nuns, but the film’s horror still works frequently. Scenes like the crucifix masturbation scene also works as a scene to both frighten and make the audience uncomfortable, shooting the sequence head on to make the audience feel like they are also in the room. Friedkin’s direction, who was hot off the success of 1971’s The French Connection, which he won the Academy Award for Best Picture and Best Director for, makes the film feel like a pseudo-documentary. The audience feels like a fly-on-the-wall of the events taking place, as the natural lightning and authentic set design gives the film the air of realism. The supernatural aspects are aesthetically toned down compared to the novel, so when they do occur, they hit harder than if the scares were frequent and expected. The head twist sequence is a pure example of this, its terrifying because it is the only attempt at doing something so incredibly outlandish in the film’s runtime.

    Spider-Walk sequence performed by stuntwoman Ann Miles

    A similar experience was exercised from the film, a spider-walk sequence where Regan comes down the stairs in a creepy crawl, ending with a shot of Regan with a blood-soaked mouth. Blatty and Friedkin disagreed on various aspects of the film, namely the crucifixion masturbation sequence, and this was one sequence which Friedkin removed because of Blatty’s insistence. The scene stayed hidden for years, with many people arguing whether it even existed in the first place but was soon found by film critic Mark Kermode in the Warner Bros. archives when researching his book analysing the film, and the scene was reinstated in the 2000s director’s cut. The director’s cut was also used to re-emphasise one of the creepiest sequences of the film, the brief flash of the true face of the demon. The demon would not be named properly until the sequel, but his form would appear as both a face flashed on screen during Karras’ dream, and as a statue found by Merrin in the film’s prologue. The directors cut made use of this subliminal flash and placed it more commonly across the film, placed in frightening moments to give a more dream-like feel to the film.

    Ellen Burstyn and subliminal appearances of Pazuzu in The Exorcist

    The legacy of The Exorcist is a hard thing to describe completely, it was a wildfire of a film which proved that horror films can be taken seriously, making more A-list actors interested in starring in horror features. A massive trend followed the release of the feature, with studios allocating larger budgets to films that fit into a similar niche for the genre, namely 1976’s The Omen and 1979’s The Amityville Horror. Exorcism features would also become a trend in the coming years, a sub-genre in horror that still dominates the box office today, with The Conjuring franchise focused on similar genre tropes started by The Exorcist.

    The film also spawned a franchise, followed by The Exorcist II: The Heretic in 1977, a film made without the involvement of either Friedkin or Blatty, and would stall the franchise for another 13 years after failing critically. In response to the negative response to the sequel, Friedkin and Blatty began work on their own sequel, which Blatty turned into his sequel novel Legion, once Friedkin departed from the project. Legion follows side characters, Detective Kinderman and Father Dyer, from the original novel, who become involved in a criminal case with a revived serial killer. The novel became the basis of Blatty’s screenplay for The Exorcist III, which he would also direct. Two attempts at a prequel following Father Merrin’s first encounter with Pazuzu would follow next, with Paul Schrader hired first and then replaced by Renny Harlin to replace him as director. Warner Bros would release Harlin’s Exorcist: The Beginning in 2004, and after becoming a critical and commercial failure, Schrader’s Dominion: Prequel to The Exorcist would be released in 2005. The latest attempt to keep this franchise alive, after a two season TV adaptation on Fox, would come from Blumhouse, after acquiring the rights to the franchise for $300 million dollars, with the release of The Exorcist: Believer in 2023. The two sequels would be scrapped after its failure, and a Mike Flanagan-directed reboot is currently in the works for the studio. As a franchise, it seems that The Exorcist floundered, but it only proves how monumental the original is, it was a lightning in a bottle film, and that is hard to capture afterwards.

    Ellen Burstyn returns in The Exorcist: Believer

    Willaim Friedkin and William Peter Blatty’s The Exorcist is a tremendous undertaking of a horror feature, an important film that legitimised the horror genre for the mainstream public. It is a completely accurate adaptation of Blatty’s original novel, with a more streamlined approach that could be argued to make the story even better. What makes the movie work so well, and what the franchise since could not recapture, is the balance between the horror and the drama. The movie, at heart, is about the distinction between science and faith, and the human drama of a man losing his faith and a woman trying to save her daughter, wrapped in a horror story focused on a demon.

    William Friedkin and Linda Blair behind the scenes of The Exorcist
  • Weapons Review

    Off the back of the release of Get Out in 2017, the horror genre has made another massive boom in relevance that has not been seen since the likes of the slasher trend in the 80s off the back of Halloween in 1978. As established through the term of ‘elevated horror’ during the post-modern legacy sequel Scream in 2022, horror has become meaningful and thematically deep once again. Horror franchises still exist and thrive, like the aforementioned Scream, or the forever relevant The Conjuring franchise that has dominated the 2010s, but as proved by the success of films like Longlegs and Sinners, original horror features with deeper metaphorical meaning and made with a director’s vision in mind has become the new hot commodity for the genre. Warner Bros has had a hell of a year so far with the success of both Sinners and Superman and entering the bidding war for Zach Creggers’ sophomore horror feature, Weapons, has landed them another certified hit.

    The studio won the bidding war against other giants like Netflix, TriStar Pictures and Universal Pictures, most notably subsidiary Monkeypaw Productions, Jordan Peele’s production company, with the Get Out-director parting ways with his managers after their loss in the bidding war. Director Zach Cregger impressed immensely with his solo feature film debut in Barbarian, a smart thriller which played with its audiences’ expectations of the genre rules and put the former member of comedy troupe The Whitest Kids U’ Know on the map as a new fresh voice in horror. This was not the first work the director-screenwriter had done for major studios, his comedy troupe were involved in the production of sitcoms Friends with Benefits, Guys with Kids and Wrecked, and co-directing with the late Trevor Moore on the panned feature film Miss March. This turn to horror put him on the map however, delivering a smart script which both thrilled and had deeper messaging around toxic masculinity and corruption, and this deeper exploration of themes only continues in 2025’s Weapons.

    Julia Garner in Weapons

    The marketing of Weapons has been very mysterious, with the unpredictability of the feature being one of its main marketing gimmicks, so this review will be as vague as possible when discussing this feature. Nevertheless, Weapons follows a mysterious tragedy that be-falls a small-town. Seventeen children mysteriously disappear in the night, all from the same class and taught by the same teacher. The film follows the town’s reaction to the unexplainable events, and the parent’s pursuit to find someone to blame.

    When being pitched to the studios through the software app Embershot on January 23 2023, Weapons was described as a ‘horror epic’, and the film easily lives up to that hybrid genre promise. Compared to the Paul Thomas Anderson feature ‘Magnolia’, the film mixes the world of horror and the film epic, combining the thrills and terror with a massive cast of characters that intersect across a grand narrative. The film’s structure is one of its most rewarding aspects, splitting the narrative into chapters that focus around one of the many characters that populate the film’s incredibly layered narrative. Events in the narrative take place across a small window of time, essentially two days, and each chapter plays out like a small piece of a larger puzzle, replaying similar events that have new meaning when viewed through new characters’ eyes. Each chapter feels like a separate film, layering out different tones and characters that all work together in such a fantastically controlled script. The movie rides the line between so many genres, adding in comedy and drama aspects as well into the pile, and Cregger combines it all together in a cohesive whole that should not work. The mystery is layered out and articulate in the details it gives you, suspenseful and scary in all the best ways, and then boils over to a ballsy and hilarious closer.

    Josh Brolin in Weapons

    When initially put into production after being purchased by Warner Bros, the film recruited a heavy sum of talent, with Pedro Pascal, Renate Reinsve, Brian Tyree Henry, Austin Abrams, Tom Burke and June Diane Raphael making up Cregger’s cast. However, once the actors strike hit in 2023 and production was delayed, Pascal, Reisve, Henry and Burke bowed out of their leading roles, and would soon be replaced with Josh Brolin, Julia Garner, Benedict Wong and Alden Ehrenreich respectively. Production delays can never be good for a feature, but here they worked out for the best, it is hard to imagine any other actors embodying their roles as easily as this cast featured here. Garner manages to convey many sides to her central teacher role, it’s a hard role to juggle, a character who is a victim because of the town’s pursuit of her being the perpetrator, but Cregger’s character don’t fall into perfect fundamental roles.

    Austin Abrams in Weapons

    Garner conveys a character who is unprofessional at times, and is a bit messy in her relationships, but the film shows she genuinely cares for the students she teaches. Brolin delivers a similar performance, playing a father who is wracked with guilt over his son’s disappearance and looking for anyone to direct his anger towards. It would be easy to make a character like this irredeemable or even completely innocent, but the script smartly does both, grief makes people do horrible things and an understanding of that comes from the audience. Benedict Wong and Alden Ehrenreich also do excellent work in their supporting roles, playing two characters that walk the line perfectly between hilarious and horrific in all the best ways. Austin Abrams’ performance makes a very stock ‘junkie’ character into an endearing and humorous part of such a talent cast, with his chapter serving as the film’s most comedic. The biggest standout of the cast however is newcomer Cary Christopher, who makes his film debut in such a crucial role here. For such a younger performer, Christopher handles a massive weight on his shoulders, the film would fall apart if his scenes were not nailed, the entire narrative forming around this one sympathetic performance.

    This character also serves to bring across Weapons’ many central themes. There is so much going on across this film, and the true metaphorical meaning of some narrative choices and visuals will be analysed for years to come, but there is still some clear messaging here. Creggers’ previous film, Barbarian, built itself around three pillars of metaphorical messaging, toxic masculinity, male rape culture and police corruption. Two of three of these central themes continue to be prevalent here, Ehrenreich’s chapter serves to highlight police corruption as a theme, but also in the failings of governmental bodies that do not seem to care about the less fortunate and their missing children, with vigilante justice being the only way the characters may save the day. Brolin’s character builds around a smaller look at toxic masculinity, representing him as a troubled father who finds it hard to fit out of the box of ‘traditional’ masculinity, which then rubs off on his child.

    Benedict Wong and Julia Garner in Weapons

    The term Weapons used in the title seems to convey the idea that bad parenting, pain, grief, the failings of governmental bodies who are meant to protect us, can all lead to a child becoming a weapon of that pain and anger. It’s a film about generational trauma, where the sins of the older generation only serve to make the lives of the next become more desperate and worrying. Zach Cregger has also sought to squash rumours that the film is metaphorically about the aftermath of the school shooting, but it is hard to shake when the points all lead to that conclusion. The central plot being focused on a school tragedy, with angry parents looking to blame anyone, even the teacher for an unexplainable event seems to connect the dots, and a dream sequence even showcases a floating gun, which seems to at least confirm an attempt to connect the supernatural events to a tragedy such as a school shooting.

    Cregger’s direction is filled with the thrills you would expect from this genre-bender rollercoaster of a feature, he has perfected the use of the tracking shot and the terror that comes from holding the camera still in long shots. Weapons is a tour-de-force showcasing of the talents of this director, a perfectly crafted film that should not work as well as it does, blending the genres of comedy, horror, drama and film epics in such a perfect way. Barbarian was the warm-up, and this is the true showing of his genius.

    Cary Christopher in Weapons
  • Bring Her Back Review

    Jonah Wren Phillips in Bring Her Back

    In the age of A24 and Blumhouse, the horror genre has made big names out of the most unlikely of faces. Jordan Peele, renowned director of such hits like Get Out and Nope, made his start as part of comedy duo Key and Peele. Barbarian director, Zach Cregger, began work as part of the comedy television troupe known as The Whitest Kids U’ Know, and Until Dawn director David F. Sandberg was discovered when making horror short films on video hosting website Youtube, with one short film turning into his directorial debut, Lights Out. Horror could easily be seen as gateway genre, built to debut entertaining and unique voices that no other genre may give a chance to, and one of those new key voices is the duo of Danny and Michael Philippou.

    The duo gained their fame from starting off as Youtube celebrities, creating the channel RackaRacka in 2013, a comedy focused channel, where the brothers filmed humorous and sometimes horrific and violent skits. A love for horror could be seen all the way back then, and after working as crew members on the 2014 film The Babadook, they began work on their directorial debut. Talk To Me served as their directorial debut, a low-budget indie that took the world by storm once it was picked up by A24 after being screened at festivals, and soon became their highest grossing film, grossing $92 million worldwide against a production budget of $4.5 million. A bold new take on the possession genre, with fresh new voices breathing new life into a tired old genre, they became a notable name in the genre.

    Sally Hawkins and Jonah Wren Phillips in Bring Her Back

    Here, three years after the release of Talk To Me, the brothers have released their follow-up feature, still contained in the horror genre. In 2025, Bring Her Back serves as their return to the big screen, continuing their exploration into the possession genre, in a fresh new way that speaks in unison with their prior work. The film follows 17-year-old Andy and his partially sighted younger stepsister Piper, after the death of their father. Thrown into the adoption agency, they become adopted by a strange woman named Laura, who recently lost her own child, and wraps the two young siblings into a sinister occult ritual.

    Bring Her Back serves as hybrid genre film, mixing the worlds of the horror-possession film with the thriller/woman’s film sub-genre of the psycho-biddy. Launched with the release of the 1962 film What Ever Happened to Baby Jane, the genre conventionally focuses around a formerly glamorous woman who has become mentally unstable and terrorizes people in her vicinity. Continuing throughout the 60s and 70s, the films contained in the sub-genre became to be seen critically by film scholars, seen as offensive films that put down its antagonists as ‘hags’, showcasing their unattractiveness and their insanity.  This 2025 reinvention of the genre stars Sally Hawkins in the role of the ‘hag’, but instead of forming the character a monstrous villain, Hawkins’ character is incredibly sympathetic.

    Sally Hawkins in Bring Her Back

    Hawkins’ career in the modern day has been characterised by a variety of heartwarming and human performances, from the family matriarch Mrs Brown in the Paddington films, or the mute woman who falls in love with an aquatic monster in Guillermo Del Toro’s The Shape of Water. Moving into a more horror-focused role, these soft-spoken and humanist performances has not been left behind, Hawkins’ plays the adopted mother character like she is still playing Mrs Brown. There is a sense of eeriness in each of her scenes, like there is something wrong under the surface, similarly to the grandparents in M. Night Shyamalan’s The Visit, but there is something genuine and down to earth about her. She wears glamorous outfits and holds herself strong, in opposition to the 60s’ version of a similar character, but when that eventual ugliness does come out in the film’s final act, it comes out as more saddening and depressing than something horrific.

    Sally Hawkins’ central performance holds the movie together, she is the centre piece, but Billy Barratt, Sora Wong and Jonah Wren Phillips all hold their own performance-wise, as aforementioned Andy and Piper, and Phillips as Hawkins’ Laura’s foster son Oliver. Barratt and Wong share incredible chemistry as stepbrother and stepsister, a believable relationship that is heartwarming to view, a dynamic that is a crucial part of making the film work. Phillips’ delivers one of the most frightening child performances in a horror feature in years but also subdues a small sense of heartbreak into that terrifying performance.

    Billy Barratt and Sora Wong in Bring Her Back

    It is hard to argue whether Bring Her Back is better or worse than the duo’s previous directorial debut, it is going to be a strong argument for fans of the duo. However, it can be seen easily that the films work complimentary to each other. Talk To Me uses the possession sub-genre as a metaphor for drug addiction, the possessing hand makes the film’s lead, played by Sophie Wilde, addicted to the activity. Her addiction leads her to putting her friends in harm’s way and making questionable choices for another go at being possessed. The film is rooted in an exploration into grief; Wilde’s character is rooted to a wish to speak to her mother one more time.

    Grief appears as a complimentary theme for Bring Her Back, the siblings of Andy and Piper find it hard to get over their father, and Laura is dealing with her own grief around her daughter. This combination of grief should bring these characters together in collective mourning, but the unpredictability of the script allows a fresh exploration into the all-consuming feeling of grief, and the steps people may take to not feel those feelings once more. The Philippu’s also seem to be making clear messages around child endangerment and abuse and showing a concern around the adoption agency.

    Jonah Wren Phillips in Bring Her Back

    The film never reaches the terror of the scenes of hell in Talk To Me, but the more character focused storytelling leads the film into a tension-focused thriller. There is inclusion of VHS styled footage throughout, which seems to be a staple for A24 features at this point, off the back of films like Aftersun and Past Lives. The footage works however, crafting some creepy imagery, and explaining some of the film’s mysteries in a smarter way than just holding the audience’s hand through an explanation. Sound design works wonders as well in crafting some gross-out sequences. The Philippou’s have a strong control of the camera, with some fantastic editing that keeps the film tense and humorous at moments. There is a great montage set to a Yoko-Ono song which helps the film to bridge the gap between its sense of awkward humour and its tension-fuelled horror sequences.  

    Bring Her Back showcases an undeniable staying power for the youtube famous director duo, they show a great degree of control in balancing tone, with a mix of humour, horror and genuine sadness across the runtime. Bridging the world between the possession film and the psycho-biddy film, the film updates an older sub-genre to modern sensibilities, making the horror both gorey and filled with despair. Overcoming grief and the sense of never getting over that grief hangs over Sally Hawkins’ powerhouse performance, marking this as must watch for the 2025 horror summer season.

    Sally Phillips in Bring Her Back
  • I Know What You Did Last Summer Review

    Madelyn Cline, Chase Sui Wonders, Jonah Hauer-King, Tyriq Withers and Sarah Pidgeon in I Know What You Did Last Summer

    The success of Wes Craven’s Scream in 1996 cannot be downplayed, the slasher revitalized the horror genre after the 80s slasher trend finished, and opened the door for more self-reflective features, with postmodern film references all over the filmic landscape in the modern day. One of the things it caused mainly however was a line of clear copycats, just like Halloween spawned films like Friday the 13th and Nightmare on Elm Street, Scream spawned such features like Scary Movie and Urban Legend, continuing the new postmodern formula of Craven’s original feature. Probably the most famous film to come off the back of Scream is 1997’s I Know What You Did Last Summer. Based on Lois Duncan’s 1993 novel of the same name, the film took the mystery novel and turned it into a classic 80s slasher feature, a choice which some critics took issue with, viewing it as an out-of-date feature which falls back on the trappings of 80s horror rather than the positives that came from Scream. However, the movie owes its success to coming out a year after Scream, and even though fairing middling in critical reviews, the film was a box office success and has long since became a cult classic.

    The film was even written by Scream scribe Kevin Williamson. Followed a mere year later, I Still Know What You Did Last Summer was a box office success once again but essentially killed the franchise, receiving even worse critical reviews and being criticised for essentially feeling like a remake of the original. In the years since, there has only been small signs of life from Sony’s hopeful cash cow of a franchise, with an unrelated sequel coming direct to DVD in 2006, I’ll Always Know What You Did Last Summer, and a streaming reboot series released in 2021 to Amazon Prime, which was cancelled after one season.

    Lead Killer the Fisherman in I Know What You Did Last Summer

    It is only naturally that after the success of the Scream franchise coming back to the big screen once again, with successful entries in 2022 and 2023 and another instalment in the works currently, that studios would attempt to bring back their own reflexive slasher properties. Hollywood star Marlon Wayans, and his brothers Shawn Wayans and Keenan Ivory Wayans, have been announced to helm another Scary Movie feature, and Sony has returned to make another I Know What You Did Last Summer feature. In typical legacy sequel fashion, the film is titled the same as the original, and began life in 2014 when Mike Flanagan, famous for his Netflix series like The Haunting of Hill House, and Jeff Howard signed on to reboot the property. Initially pitched as a complete reboot of the franchise, removed from any connections to the original feature or the novel it was based on, the project entered development hell once Flanagan and Howard left the project. Revitalized by a legacy sequel pitch from director Jennifer Kaytin Robinson, the film has finally seen the light of day in cinemas now.

    The 2025 legacy sequel follows a new group of friends who become plagued by a hook-wielding fisherman killer after they covered up an accidental murder. 27 years later after a similar incident, the friend group recruits original survivors Julie James and Ray Bronson to help them stop the killer.

    Jennifer Love Hewitt and Freddie Prince Jr in I Know What You Did Last Summer

    The film sees the return of franchise star Jennifer Love Hewitt to the big screen, with her mainly being seen on television for the past decade, with brief appearances on shows like 9-1-1 and Criminal Minds. A baffling scene in the third act sees the character state that nostalgia is overrated, when the entire backbone of this feature is nostalgia. The choice to see the return of Hewitt and Freddie Prince Jr to the franchise is done to harken back to the originals, the movie follows the legacy sequel trend that 2018’s Halloween and 2022’s Scream started. Hewitt takes the role of Laurie Strode or Sidney Prescott from the previously mentioned features, a background returning character that serves only to remind audiences of the original and appear for the triumphant third act.

    Prince Jr continues the archetype started by the return of David Arquette’s Dewey in 2022’s Scream, a grizzled and saddened version of the character we once knew who returns to bring wisdom to the new characters and to inform them on the rules of the franchise. Just like every other legacy sequel, the film follows the exact same formula of the original, essentially acting as a remake but with returning characters. The newly added elements also just make the film feel like a spoof of Scream, the whodunnit nature is more present here, with various potential killers rather than just the one of the original. Red herrings are present throughout, and there is an attempt to have a postmodern conversation about nostalgia, but it all falls flat when the movie is falling back on nostalgia itself.

    Freddie Prince Jr in I Know What You Did Last Summer

    The movie is relatively safe in its narrative, if you have seen the original, then you have also seen this film. There is a bold attempt at subverting legacy sequel tropes in the third act, but it is choreographed well ahead of its reveal and will only serve to presumably annoy people who enjoy the original feature. Hewitt and Prince Jr give serviceable performance in their screen time, but the biggest pitfall of the newest legacy feature is how little it gives its new characters. Each new character is given an archetypal role that boils down their personalities and gives them very little else, giving newcomers Madelyn Cline, Chase Sui Wonders, Jonah Hauer-King, Tyriq Withers and Sarah Pidgeon very little to work with. When attempting to undertake a narrative like a whodunnit, it is important to make the characters memorable, and this film fails to follow through on that. They all feel like characters that would be found comfortably in an 80s slasher, whose only purpose is to become part of the body count.

    Editing inconsistencies also plague this film throughout, the lead killer seems to be able to teleport in sequences where it is clear moments have been stripped away in the edit, and there are scenes where characters seem to be changing attire in the same scene. The end tease for a potential sequel also seems to be based around a removed scene that was in an earlier screening of the film, with this line inclusion now seeming out of place with that scene removed. The entire plot of the film also hinges on an accident that does not make much sense, with screenwriters Sam Lansky and Jennifer Kaytin Robinson writing themselves in a corner with how to explain the killer’s motivations and the guilt of its central characters.

    Kills are brutal and creative throughout, with Robinson’s direction shining when making the use of shadows and making the use of impressive sound design in engaging kills. It is one of the clear standouts of a confused and middling script, but it cannot save a film which is struggling to stand out from the shadow of the Scream juggernaut. 2025’s I Know What You Did Last Summer feels like a late entry into the legacy sequel trend, a film irking of the success of much better slasher films in the last decade, and reflects the failings that can come from this once-dead genre.

    Madelyn Cline, Chase Sui Wonders and Sarah Pidgeon in I Know What You Did Last Summer
  • The Life of Chuck Review

    Tom Hiddleston in The Life of Chuck

    Stephen King is one of the most popular horror authors of the modern day, publishing almost 60 novels since the release of his first novel in 1974, known as Carrie. Though, most known as a horror author, it’s the author’s non-horror works that have made the biggest splash critically when being translated to the big screen. Director Rob Reiner’s 1986 film Stand By Me, based on short story ‘The Body’, and Frank Darabont’s pair of releases, 1994’s The Shawshank Redemption and 1999’s The Green Mile based on the short story and novel of the same name, stand as prime examples of the success of adaptations of King’s more dramatic pieces of work.

    Director Mike Flanagan has already had tremendous success working with King, adapting two of his horror novels, Doctor Sleep and Gerald’s Game, into features released in 2019 and 2017 respectively. The director is also most known for his horror works, starting with his low budget feature Absentia in 2011, and most probably known to a general public for his horror Netflix television series, notably 2018’s The Haunting of Hill House, 2020’s The Haunting of Bly Manor, 2021’s Midnight Mass, 2022’s The Midnight Club and 2023’s The Fall of The House of Usher. Before he returns to the worlds of horror, with the director attached to a new Exorcist film and a Carrie television series for Amazon Prime next, Flanagan has sought out a lesser-known King-drama short story to adapt, The Life of Chuck.

    Carl Lumbly and Chiwetel Ejiofor in The Life of Chuck

    Told through 3 separate chapters, that tell the life of Charles Krantz, known as Chuck to his friends, as the film explores the character’s life backwards. Starting with the end of his life, and beginning with his coming of age, the film and original short story showcases how the people in his life shaped him to the man he is, exploring the multitudes of life and memory.  

    Through his previous two works adapting the horror author, it was clear to argue that King and Flanagan almost felt like they were made for each other, the connection between King’s introspective dialogues and Flanagan’s wordy monologues is palpable. The same can be said for The Life of Chuck, a short story that seems like it was made to be adapted by Flanagan. Flanagan makes the genius decision to give this film a voice-over narration, with Nick Offerman doing the voice-over duties, delivering narration directly from the novel word-for-word. This helps the narrative for sure, some of the strongest emotional beats come from Offerman’s delivery and words and helps to bring structure to such a weirdly structured film. Delivering accurate narration onto the big screen is not the only thing pulled from the short story, the film essentially brings everything from the story onto the screen, favouring expansion to some elements than removing any. Narrative-wise, the story of this film leans a lot more on the emotional side of the King adaptation filmography, its overly sentimental and wordy in its messaging, a choice that will not work for every audience member but works well for people used to Flanagan’s dialogue-heavy previous projects.

    Mark Hamill in The Life of Chuck

    Flanagan’s Netflix series, mostly Midnight Mass, would be criticised commonly for its lengthy dialogue sequences, with many conversations between characters ranging between 3 to 5 minutes in length. These scenes could be argued as an example of show, don’t tell, featuring characters discussing the themes of the show, exploring topics of religion, greed, death and the meaning of life, but the writing was so well-realised and moving that it could be ignored for its lengthy inclusion. This film is a treasure-trove of lengthy monologues, the film being held together by the people that come in and out of Chuck’s life, imparting wisdom on him and then leaving the narrative. Running just under two hours, viewers who would criticise Flanagan’s meaningful but lengthy dialogue sequences may find the inclusion here more meaningful and emotional in their frequented but shortened inclusion.

    The themes that the director explored in his long-running series also make appearances here, from discussion around religion, the fear of death and the meaning of life, all explored in new ways through both the characters and the central narration. The narrative also being in reverse chronological order allows for a central mystery to build, opening with characters dealing with the end of the world, and how this end links to a man they barely know, Chuck. Through the reverse chronological narrative, the film becomes more complex and denser as the narrative moves on, revealing answers and a central twist as Chuck’s life becomes simpler and more mundane, from adult to child.

    Karen Gillan and Chiwetel Ejiofor in The Life of Chuck

    Flanagan’s film has delivered an incredibly surprising cast, with most of its biggest names being in small scenes and essentially cameos. Flanagan mainstays, that have populated his casts for a decade at this point each get a moment to shine, notably Rahul Kohli, Carl Lumbly, Kate Siegel and Samantha Sloyan. David Dastmalchian and Harvey Guillen share a fun singular sequence each which brings some welcome levity to the proceedings. Scream and now-Five Nights at Freddy’s star Matthew Lillard has a memorable sequence that will tug at the heart strings, and Nightmare on Elm Street’s own Heather Langenkamp makes a notable return to the big screen. Starting the film off with people reacting to Chuck outside of meeting the character ourselves, welcomes Chiwetel Ejiofor and Karen Gillan into essentially being the opening acts main characters and they handle the focus perfectly. Newcomers to the worlds of overlong monologues, they seem naturals at talking about the meaning of life and death itself. Mark Hamill and Mia Sara give heartbreaking performances as Chuck’s grandparents, bringing some realistic humanity to such a fantasy-esque narrative.

    Benjamin Pajak in The Life of Chuck

    The titular character has been marketed as being played by Tom Hiddleston, but the Marvel-star is in very little of the film. Chuck’s most common actor is newcomer Benjamin Pajak as the 11-year-old version of the character, and he delivers the true heart of the movie through his performance. The entire narrative reveals itself through his impassioned performance, reflecting himself through Hiddleston’’s short tenure as the character, selling the positivity of the character amongst all the pain he encounters, his love of dance and the teenage angst that comes at that age.

    The Life of Chuck stands strong next to some of King’s most successful adaptations. Mike Flanagan just knows how to breath the cinematic language into the author’s texts, delivering a scene like a man and woman dancing to a reggae beat which any other director could make silly or heartless, but it ends up on the screen as a heartfelt and moving sequence. It may be overly sentimental at times, but the heart is in the right place, it’s a movie which feels like a lifetime, filled with so many characters and actors giving a moment of wisdom. Each sequence feels better than the last, feeling like a film designed perfectly for fans of both Flanagan and King.

  • The Fantastic Four: First Steps Review

    Ebon Moss-Bachrach, Joseph Quinn, Pedro Pascal and Vanessa Kirby in The Fantastic Four: First Steps

    In the age of the modern superhero boom, the time where characters like Captain America, Spider-Man, Iron Man and many more have flown into the cultural zeitgeist there has always been one team that has struggled to marvel audiences on the big screen, The Fantastic Four. Originally conceived into live action in 1994, with the Roger Corman-backed low-budget feature bearing their name, that project was scrapped once completed, and will presumably never see the light of day as a released picture. 20th Century Fox took a second chance at the team in 2005, starring Chris Evans, Ioan Gruffudd, Jessica Alba and Michael Chiklis, which was successful enough to warrant a sequel, Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer in 2007. Plans for a third film and a Silver Surfer spinoff would be cancelled after the box office disappointment of the 2007 follow-up, and the franchise would lay dormant again. Just in time to keep the rights away from transferring back to Marvel Studios, 20th Century Fox would return Marvel’s First Family to the big screen with Josh Trank’s Fantastic Four in 2015. Starring Michael B. Jordan, Kate Mara, Miles Teller and Jamie Bell, the film was a massive critical bomb, and the behind-the-scenes drama would break the potential franchise that would come.

    Fourth time seems the charm for Marvel Studios, as the Fantastic Four have returned home and joined their Cinematic Universe, after Disney’s buyout of 20th Century Fox. The Fantastic Four: First Steps follows these famous heroes, four years removed from their origin that gave them their fantastic powers, as they exist in an alternate reality to the one where the Avengers reside. When Vanessa Kirby’s Sue Storm falls pregnant and the team comes into conflict with Julia Garner’s Silver Surfer and Ralph Ineson’s Galactus, the team must come together as a family once more to welcome the new child and stop their planet from being destroyed.

    Pedro Pascal, Vanessa Kirby, Ebon Moss-Bachrach and Joseph

    The most notable part of the film’s marketing campaign has been its focus on its new setting, capturing a reality which resembles the 1960s and the retro-futuristic artwork that Jack Kirby drawn in the team’s first comic outings. The film’s world is one of the highlights for sure, the film has a clear style in the set dressing, costumes and direction that gives it an authentic old-timely charm. A studio which commonly makes the use of green screen instead of authentic sets, Marvel Studios makes a welcome change here by giving their actors an actual palpable world to bounce off with, as the sets complement director Matt Shakman’s direction. Best known as a TV director, directing episodes of It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia, Game of Thrones and Marvel’s own WandaVision, he shows of a great level of control behind the camera and wows with some breathtaking visuals. Cinematographer Jess Hall works to capture the film with so much colour, colour that has been missing from Marvel’s output lately. Michael Giacchino’s score gives the movie an upbeat and timely feel, matching the tension and the family moments that are contained in the film. The world just feels alive because of these technical aspects, and the fact that the film spends so much time showcasing the world’s reaction to the heroics of its signature team. Ripped out of Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man movies, the public are important to the movie, saving lives are important and it imbues the film’s optimistic view of the world.

    Pedro Pascal and Vanessa Kirby are the leads of the film as the stretching scientist, Mr Fantastic, and the invisible matriarch of the family, the Invisible Woman, respectively. Pascal delivers a side to the troubled scientist that no actor has been able to yet, the fear of a newborn in the family, a part of life he cannot control, or study is something he is terrified of. Pascal delivers the vulnerability of a man obsessed with science, to the point that he thinks there is something wrong with him. Kirby is the first time Sue Storm has felt like a fully fleshed out character in one of The Fantastic Four’s cinematic outings, she is the heart of the team, the matriarch that keeps the family together. She gets to show off her powers during her fight scene with showy effects and flex her emotional range when her son comes under threat.

    Vanessa Kirby and Pedro Pascal in The Fantastic Four: First Steps

    Joseph Quinn’s hot-headed Human Torch gets a lot of play in the story, tying him in with a small romantic story where he gets to fight conventions of the idiot he is thought of as. Quinn nails the comedic aspect of the character, but also how deeply loyal he is to his sister and overall family. Ebon Moss-Bachrach’s super-strong The Thing gets the least to do narrative wise, but he remains a strong character, feeling like the member of the team that deals with the public the most, contrasting his rocky exterior with a kind and gentle demeanour. His romantic side-plot with Natasha Lyonne however feels like an afterthought, contained to merely two scenes. The highlight of the film is seeing the central four interact, they bounce off one another splendidly, with the film spending a lot of time setting up this dysfunctional but loving family.

    Action sequences take a backseat in the film, for a clearer focus on drama. There are essentially only two action sequences across the film, but the film stills have a lot of plots to crawl through in its small runtime. Once the plot starts going, a mere 20 minutes or so into the feature, the film moves at an incredibly fast pace and never lets up, feeling too fast in some moments. Based on the recent news that John Malkovich’s character was cut from the theatrical release of the film, it seems there is a longer cut that exists, a longer runtime that the film would benefit from. More time would be beneficial to focus on the strongest aspect of the film, the family dynamic, but also the side characters that seem like an afterthought in the fast-moving narrative. Additional scenes would benefit the non-existent romantic relationship between Nastasha Lyonne and The Thing, and Paul Walter Hauser’s Mole Man, who’s role feels superfluous in the overall narrative flow. The opening struggles the most with this squeezed runtime, with the editing being sloppy and chaotic as it clearly squashes a longer-opening featuring Malkovich’s Red Ghost into a montage which only mentions the character.

    Ralph Ineson provides the voice of Galactus in The Fantastic Four: First Steps

    A longer runtime would also benefit the most wasted aspects of the film, Silver Surfer and Galactus. This film feels like a second try at Jack Kirby and Stan Lee’s Galactus saga which was already adapted in 2007’s Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer. There, Galactus was translated into a planet destroying space cloud, but here is translated into the giant god in purple armour. The movie sets it apart as well from moving away from the iconic Norrin Radd, comic’s most famous Silver Surfer, in favour of Julia Garner’s Shalla-Ball. The character feels very one note across the film’s runtime, with only one scene giving Garner any material to chew on dramatically. For most of the film, she exists as a visual effects-created antagonist, whose only role essentially serves to herald Galactus and has Human Torch be attracted to her. Ralph Ineson’s Galactus does not serve much better but at least has the booming presence that comes with the design and the voice. The threat of the character feels larger than the actual depiction of the character, his lack of screen time allows him to feel like a bigger threat as his name continues the mind of its characters, but when the character does eventually draw his head into the narrative, he meanders more than wows.

    Julia Garner in The Fantastic Four: First Steps

    The Fantastic Four: First Steps is easily the best out of the team’s cinematic outings, but it is not without its pitfalls. The central four are casted perfectly and are brimming with personality and family charm, but the film doesn’t always blend the world of family drama and superhero action perfectly. Pacing is shaky across the film, and the film falls when dealing with its generic end-of-the-world plot, with paper thin villains. It however promises more to come, with Marvel’s First Family looking to improve in future outings.

    Pedro Pascal, Vanessa Kirby, Ebon Moss-Bachrach and Joseph
  • Ghostbusters: Lightning In A Bottle

    Ernie Hudson, Bill Murray, Harold Ramis and Dan Aykroyd star in Ghostbusters

    Released in 1984, a film about four down-on-their-luck working class men who start a ghost-catching business to make money became the start of a long-running multimedia franchise. Ghostbusters, the brainchild of star Dan Aykroyd, was originally conceived as a big-budget project featuring Aykroyd and John Belushi as they hunted down supernatural threats across time and space. After the death of the former and director Ivan Reitman joined the project, the film was downsized to the New York-set supernatural-comedy hybrid that it is remembered fondly for now. It is hard to argue against that Ghostbusters was a lightning-in-the-bottle film, releasing in the height of the careers of Aykroyd, Bill Murray and Harold Ramis after their stints on Saturday Night Live, and capturing a moment in Hollywood where blockbusters and franchise cinema were becoming a hot-commodity.

    A film that spawned the future of big budget comedy features and set in a very specific time in America which formulated the narrative, and it’s a film that is hard to replicate. The popularity of the film spawned one of the pillars of multimedia merchandising, off the back of the success of Star Wars’ similar turn in 1977, launching the follow-up animated series The Real Ghostbusters in 1986 and its sequel, Extreme Ghostbusters in 1997. The theme song ‘Ghostbusters’ by Ray Parker Jr was a number one hit for 3 weeks, spending 21 weeks on the charts, and starting the trend of film-artist theme song collaborations. Reitman would return for a sequel in 1989, and a third film was eventually cancelled after the death of Ramis in 2014, instead being followed by a reboot in 2016, and a direct-follow-up to the original directed by Reitman’s son, Jason Reitman, in the duology of Ghostbusters: Afterlife in 2021 and Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire in 2024. Each subsequent film has been a success of course, successful enough to warrant continuations, but never has the franchise hit the peak of the original, with the first sequel seeing diminishing returns instantly, seeing negative reviews on release and a drop in box office, earning a worldwide gross of $215.4 million against the original’s $282.2 million.

    Behind the scenes with director Ivan Reitman

    Director Ivan Reitman found success with his collaborations with star Bill Murray in comedies Meatballs in 1979 and Stripes in 1981, with his prior work being the horror-comedy feature Cannibal Girls in 1973. This collaboration between the pair would come as one of the biggest strengths of the feature, as the passion project of Aykroyd became a star vehicle for Murray, playing lead character Peter Venkman. Both star and director’s background in comedy lent the film a comfortable edge in bringing alive the SNL-like comedy that would be absent from the sequels. The ghost-catching business the protagonists would take part in would be a clear spoof on exterminators, capturing the reactions of the everyday working-class man as a blockbuster hero, while also making time for the scientific backdrop that Aykroyd was so interested in. Murray plays his role with deadpan expressions, playing the character as a suave conman who is straightened out by a romantic encounter with Sigourney Weavers’ Dana Barrett. Aykroyd’s Ray Stanz is the fanatic of the group, one of the two scientists that make up the cast as the character reflects the actor’s obsession with the supernatural.

    Ramis’ Egon Spengler serves as the straight man of the group, a colder and more serious scientist whose comedic input comes from his own deadpan delivery, a character favoured by Ramis when he co-wrote the script with Aykroyd. Ernie Hudson’s Winston Zeddemore joins the central cast late into the runtime and serves as the film’s ‘normal’ man of the group, just a man trying to make money with no scientific backdrop. These four characters are central to the film, using the supernatural elements as a backdrop for situational comedy and allowing the actors to bounce off one another. One of the key sequences to show this is the Ghostbusters’ first job, with the central three bouncing off each other in a still middle shot in the elevator. Once Egon turns on Ray’s proton pack, Egon and Venkman scoot further away from him, eyes raised high as they hope it doesn’t explode. They become startled once they exit the elevator, shooting a maid and her trolly with their proton packs as they scream in terror, and would soon follow that mess with destroying the entire interior of the building they are trying to save from Slimer. Scenes like this showcase the importance of the actors’ heightened performances and situational comedy to the success of the original feature.

    Harold Ramis, Dan Aykroyd and Bill Murray in Ghostbusters

    Sequels struggled with continuing these comedic threads, with one of the major complaints of Reitman’s initial sequel was that the comedy was made more family-oriented in response to the success of the animated series. The film’s plot was also critiqued for its similarities to the original, replicating the events of the original and resetting most character’s arcs for the beginning of the film. 2016’s reboot made a return to the comedy of the original, but with a swapped gendered cast it became a controversial film on the internet. Both late sequels by Jason Reitman reflected two separate looks at the franchise, as Afterlife took focus as a serious-drama dealing with the brand as almost mythological, and then Frozen Empire being easy to be described as a live-action version of an animated series episode. This mismatch tones led to the former film to be seen as a failure critically and at the box-office, reflecting how far the franchise has strayed from the original. Ghostbusters becoming a franchise has become one of its major weaknesses in some regards.

    Socio-political commentary precedes over the narrative of Ivan Reitman’s original feature. The film reflected the new free market that came after the 1970’s financial turmoil that inspired the look of a grungy and uncomfortable New York that preceded over films like Taxi Driver and Escape From New York. The grunge was still present moving into the 1980s, but Ghostbusters reflects the freedom that comes from new President Ronald Reagan’s sweeping reforms, reflecting a feeling of togetherness and comfortability for the working-class people. Reaganomics focused on limited government spending and the removal of state regulations, in favour of a free market provided by the private sector and private businesses. The incoming movement of free markets and mass-consumerism because of so, is reflected in the film commonly, from Ray being unable to think of anything other than a consumerist mascot in The Stay Puft Marshmallow Man, or the first encounter with Zuul being in a stocked fridge. Ghostbusters’ draws its comedy from being a satire of American way of life moving into this era, spoofing the academia and intellectuals of the upper classes, governmental officials and tax officers, and the average New Yorker.

    Slavitza Jovan joins the cast of Ghostbusters as Gozer

    The entire plot is based around the private business owned by the four protagonists, as the governmental official, Walter Peck, played by Willaim Atherton, causes more problems for them. Peck’s involvement in trying to close this private business leads to the ghosts being freed and the eventual freedom of lead ghost antagonist Gozer, marking Peck as the true antagonist of the film. The movie sparks a connection to the new working class that had finally been given a leg over in making money, as the government is incapable of containing the threat, while the private sector comes in to save the day, working for a fee, however. The mayor picks a size in the conflict; paying for the Ghostbusters to save the day once he realises his own backers cannot do much to help and Peck reveals himself to be useless, and after being reminded that his choice will help to save millions of registered voters that could help him stay in power. It is a still cynical look at America, reflecting government officials only doing what is right, only helping the private sector when it benefits them as well.

    Removed from this political context, the cynical nature of the first film is lost in the sequels. Ghostbusters II reflects the commercialisation of the franchise at the time, but in less of a spoof and more leaning into becoming a product. It’s central plot around a river of slime appearing in New York which is leading to New Yorkers becoming more hostile to one another feels more cartoonish in nature. There is still political commentary, with the Ghostbusters institutionalised after being outspoken around their ghost encounters, being forced to give up their jobs by the government that looked like fools because of them. They are only brought back into action when the government lift their ban to save the day when the government once again fail in containing the threat, reaffirming the private sector’s importance against governmental bonds.

    Behind the scenes of Ghostbusters, designing the Stay Puft Marshmallow Man

    What becomes the problem is that the film is mainly just reaffirming the political context of the original, copying the events and doing them just again, but this time in a less serious manner and with more childish antics. The Ghostbusters are locked away in the first film as well, with the franchise running out of ideas from its first sequel. 2016’s franchise reboot would see the same series of events happening, with governmental officials stopping the now-female Ghostbusters from doing their work, but removing the political context of the original, it just feels like an imitation. Similar could be said with 2024’s Ghostbuster: Frozen Empire, which brought back Peck to threaten the Ghostbuster’s with closure once again, ticking one more of the franchise’s tropes off the list.

    In the years after the release of the original Ghostbusters, the popularity of the film’s mise-en-scene would transcend the original context of the film. A film about working class pest controllers who save the day because the government cannot stop the pests, and they save the day for a quick buck, would be remembered for the pop culture toys that hit the zeitgeist. Slimer, the Stay Puft Marshmallow Man, the Proton Pack, the Ecto-1 would all become the face of the franchise, morphing the franchise from one which placed comedy foremost other its blockbuster qualities, into one that would market itself as the newest summer action blockbuster. The newest entry, Frozen Empire, seen the entirety of New York encased in ice as an end-of-the-world threat, with almost eight Ghostbusters assembling to stop the threat. The days of the franchise being a simple situational comedy, using ghosts as backdrop, has long gone, but the original film remains as an important touchstone in cinematic history, a lightning-in-a-bottle feature.  

    Ernie Hudson, Harold Ramis, Bill Murray and Dan Aykroyd behind the scenes of Ghostbusters