Weapons Review

Off the back of the release of Get Out in 2017, the horror genre has made another massive boom in relevance that has not been seen since the likes of the slasher trend in the 80s off the back of Halloween in 1978. As established through the term of ‘elevated horror’ during the post-modern legacy sequel Scream in 2022, horror has become meaningful and thematically deep once again. Horror franchises still exist and thrive, like the aforementioned Scream, or the forever relevant The Conjuring franchise that has dominated the 2010s, but as proved by the success of films like Longlegs and Sinners, original horror features with deeper metaphorical meaning and made with a director’s vision in mind has become the new hot commodity for the genre. Warner Bros has had a hell of a year so far with the success of both Sinners and Superman and entering the bidding war for Zach Creggers’ sophomore horror feature, Weapons, has landed them another certified hit.

The studio won the bidding war against other giants like Netflix, TriStar Pictures and Universal Pictures, most notably subsidiary Monkeypaw Productions, Jordan Peele’s production company, with the Get Out-director parting ways with his managers after their loss in the bidding war. Director Zach Cregger impressed immensely with his solo feature film debut in Barbarian, a smart thriller which played with its audiences’ expectations of the genre rules and put the former member of comedy troupe The Whitest Kids U’ Know on the map as a new fresh voice in horror. This was not the first work the director-screenwriter had done for major studios, his comedy troupe were involved in the production of sitcoms Friends with Benefits, Guys with Kids and Wrecked, and co-directing with the late Trevor Moore on the panned feature film Miss March. This turn to horror put him on the map however, delivering a smart script which both thrilled and had deeper messaging around toxic masculinity and corruption, and this deeper exploration of themes only continues in 2025’s Weapons.

The marketing of Weapons has been very mysterious, with the unpredictability of the feature being one of its main marketing gimmicks, so this review will be as vague as possible when discussing this feature. Nevertheless, Weapons follows a mysterious tragedy that be-falls a small-town. Seventeen children mysteriously disappear in the night, all from the same class and taught by the same teacher. The film follows the town’s reaction to the unexplainable events, and the parent’s pursuit to find someone to blame.

When being pitched to the studios through the software app Embershot on January 23 2023, Weapons was described as a ‘horror epic’, and the film easily lives up to that hybrid genre promise. Compared to the Paul Thomas Anderson feature ‘Magnolia’, the film mixes the world of horror and the film epic, combining the thrills and terror with a massive cast of characters that intersect across a grand narrative. The film’s structure is one of its most rewarding aspects, splitting the narrative into chapters that focus around one of the many characters that populate the film’s incredibly layered narrative. Events in the narrative take place across a small window of time, essentially two days, and each chapter plays out like a small piece of a larger puzzle, replaying similar events that have new meaning when viewed through new characters’ eyes. Each chapter feels like a separate film, layering out different tones and characters that all work together in such a fantastically controlled script. The movie rides the line between so many genres, adding in comedy and drama aspects as well into the pile, and Cregger combines it all together in a cohesive whole that should not work. The mystery is layered out and articulate in the details it gives you, suspenseful and scary in all the best ways, and then boils over to a ballsy and hilarious closer.

When initially put into production after being purchased by Warner Bros, the film recruited a heavy sum of talent, with Pedro Pascal, Renate Reinsve, Brian Tyree Henry, Austin Abrams, Tom Burke and June Diane Raphael making up Cregger’s cast. However, once the actors strike hit in 2023 and production was delayed, Pascal, Reisve, Henry and Burke bowed out of their leading roles, and would soon be replaced with Josh Brolin, Julia Garner, Benedict Wong and Alden Ehrenreich respectively. Production delays can never be good for a feature, but here they worked out for the best, it is hard to imagine any other actors embodying their roles as easily as this cast featured here. Garner manages to convey many sides to her central teacher role, it’s a hard role to juggle, a character who is a victim because of the town’s pursuit of her being the perpetrator, but Cregger’s character don’t fall into perfect fundamental roles.

Garner conveys a character who is unprofessional at times, and is a bit messy in her relationships, but the film shows she genuinely cares for the students she teaches. Brolin delivers a similar performance, playing a father who is wracked with guilt over his son’s disappearance and looking for anyone to direct his anger towards. It would be easy to make a character like this irredeemable or even completely innocent, but the script smartly does both, grief makes people do horrible things and an understanding of that comes from the audience. Benedict Wong and Alden Ehrenreich also do excellent work in their supporting roles, playing two characters that walk the line perfectly between hilarious and horrific in all the best ways. Austin Abrams’ performance makes a very stock ‘junkie’ character into an endearing and humorous part of such a talent cast, with his chapter serving as the film’s most comedic. The biggest standout of the cast however is newcomer Cary Christopher, who makes his film debut in such a crucial role here. For such a younger performer, Christopher handles a massive weight on his shoulders, the film would fall apart if his scenes were not nailed, the entire narrative forming around this one sympathetic performance.

This character also serves to bring across Weapons’ many central themes. There is so much going on across this film, and the true metaphorical meaning of some narrative choices and visuals will be analysed for years to come, but there is still some clear messaging here. Creggers’ previous film, Barbarian, built itself around three pillars of metaphorical messaging, toxic masculinity, male rape culture and police corruption. Two of three of these central themes continue to be prevalent here, Ehrenreich’s chapter serves to highlight police corruption as a theme, but also in the failings of governmental bodies that do not seem to care about the less fortunate and their missing children, with vigilante justice being the only way the characters may save the day. Brolin’s character builds around a smaller look at toxic masculinity, representing him as a troubled father who finds it hard to fit out of the box of ‘traditional’ masculinity, which then rubs off on his child.

The term Weapons used in the title seems to convey the idea that bad parenting, pain, grief, the failings of governmental bodies who are meant to protect us, can all lead to a child becoming a weapon of that pain and anger. It’s a film about generational trauma, where the sins of the older generation only serve to make the lives of the next become more desperate and worrying. Zach Cregger has also sought to squash rumours that the film is metaphorically about the aftermath of the school shooting, but it is hard to shake when the points all lead to that conclusion. The central plot being focused on a school tragedy, with angry parents looking to blame anyone, even the teacher for an unexplainable event seems to connect the dots, and a dream sequence even showcases a floating gun, which seems to at least confirm an attempt to connect the supernatural events to a tragedy such as a school shooting.

Cregger’s direction is filled with the thrills you would expect from this genre-bender rollercoaster of a feature, he has perfected the use of the tracking shot and the terror that comes from holding the camera still in long shots. Weapons is a tour-de-force showcasing of the talents of this director, a perfectly crafted film that should not work as well as it does, blending the genres of comedy, horror, drama and film epics in such a perfect way. Barbarian was the warm-up, and this is the true showing of his genius.